切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (06) : 558 -562. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2023.06.003

临床研究

多参数MRI与超声认知融合引导下前列腺靶向穿刺的前瞻性研究
梁健, 何京伟(), 关文峰, 梁其炎, 冯能卓, 黄亦欣, 覃文超   
  1. 529500 广东,阳江市人民医院泌尿外二科
  • 收稿日期:2022-06-01 出版日期:2023-12-01
  • 通信作者: 何京伟
  • 基金资助:
    阳江市医疗卫生类科技计划项目(SF2020016); 阳江市人民医院2020年度院级科研基金项目(2020A3)

A prospective randomized controlled study of mpMRI-TRUS-guided cognitive fusion targeted prostate biopsies

Jian Liang, Jingwei He(), Wenfeng Guan, Qiyan Liang, Nengzhuo Feng, Yixin Huang, Wenchao Qin   

  1. Department of Urology, Yangjiang People's Hospital, Guangdong 529500, China
  • Received:2022-06-01 Published:2023-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Jingwei He
引用本文:

梁健, 何京伟, 关文峰, 梁其炎, 冯能卓, 黄亦欣, 覃文超. 多参数MRI与超声认知融合引导下前列腺靶向穿刺的前瞻性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 558-562.

Jian Liang, Jingwei He, Wenfeng Guan, Qiyan Liang, Nengzhuo Feng, Yixin Huang, Wenchao Qin. A prospective randomized controlled study of mpMRI-TRUS-guided cognitive fusion targeted prostate biopsies[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 558-562.

目的

探讨多参数磁共振(mpMRI)-经直肠超声(TRUS)影像认知融合引导下前列腺靶向穿刺联合系统穿刺活检术在诊断前列腺癌方面的可行性及有效性。

方法

选取2020年3月至2022年3月在阳江市人民医院首次行前列腺穿刺活检的患者111例,随机分组,观察组56例,对照组55例。观察组患者行mpMRI-TRUS影像认知融合引导下前列腺靶向穿刺联合系统性穿刺术,对照组患者单纯行12针TRUS引导下系统性穿刺活检术。比较两组患者在总体穿刺阳性率、有临床意义前列腺癌的检出率、漏诊率、单针阳性率、标本肿瘤组织长度、标本癌占比、并发症及在二次穿刺、经尿道前列腺剜除或根治术后病理升级的例数等方面的差异。

结果

两组患者在年龄、直肠指检阳性率、前列腺体积、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、穿刺针数、mpMRI前列腺影像报告和数据评分系统(PI-RADS)及术后并发症方面差异均无统计学意义。但观察组在总体穿刺阳性率(50.0% vs 27.3%,P=0.014)、有临床意义前列腺癌的检出率(50.0% vs 25.5%,P=0.008)及单针阳性率(26.8% vs 16.0%,P<0.001)方面明显高于对照组。此外,观察组病理标本还表现出更长的肿瘤组织长度[(8±4)mm vs (4±3)mm,P=0.001]、更高的癌占比[(64.5±20.7)% vs (40.0±23.8)%,P=0.002],更低的漏诊率(0% vs 25.0%,P=0.021),以及出现更少的二次穿刺、经尿道前列腺剜除或根治术后病理升级的情况(0例vs 8例,P=0.009)。

结论

mpMRI-TRUS影像认知融合引导下前列腺靶向穿刺联合系统穿刺活检术能明显提高总体穿刺阳性率及有临床意义前列腺癌的检出率,降低前列腺癌穿刺活检的漏诊率,同时还能减少二次穿刺、经尿道前列腺剜除或根治术后病理升级的情况,且操作简单、便捷、安全,适合临床推广。

Objective

To investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of the mpMRI-TRUS-guided cognitive fusion targeted prostate biopsies combined with systematic biopsies in the diagnosis of prostate carcinoma.

Methods

A prospective and randomized study of 111 patients who underwent prostate biopsy for the first time in Yangjiang People's Hospital from March 2020 to March 2022 randomly assigned into two groups, with 56 cases in observation group and 55 cases in control group. The observation group adopted mpMRI-TRUS-guided cognitive fusion targeted prostate biopsies combined with systematic biopsies, whereas the control group performed 12-needle systematic biopsies. The differences of overall puncture positive rate, the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer, the rate of missed diagnosis, the positive rate of single core, the tumor tissue length of specimen, the tumor proportion of specimen, postoperative complications and the cases of pathological upgrading after secondary puncture, transurethral enucleation or radical resection were compared between the two groups.

Results

There were no significant differences in age, the positive rate of digital rectal examination,prostate volume, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), the cores of biopsies, PI-RADS scores and postoperative complications between the two groups. However, in the observation group, the overall puncture positive rate (50.0% vs 27.3%, P=0.014), the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (50.0% vs 25.5%, P=0.008) and the positive rate of single core (26.8% vs 16.0%, P<0.001) was significantly higher than the control group. Moreover, the observation group showed longer tumor tissue length of specimen [(8±4) mm vs (4±3) mm, P=0.001], higher tumor proportion of specimen [(64.5±20.7)% vs (40.0±23.8)%, P=0.002], lower missed diagnosis rate (0% vs 25.0%, P=0.021), and less pathological upgrading cases after secondary puncture, transurethral enucleation or radical resection (0 vs 8, P=0.009).

Conclusions

The mpMRI-TRUS-guided cognitive fusion targeted prostate biopsies combined with systematic biopsies can significantly improve the overall puncture positive rate and the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer, reduce the rate of missed diagnosis and the cases of pathological upgrading after secondary puncture, enucleation or radical resection, while the operation is simple, convenient, safe and suitable for clinical promotion.

表1 两组进行前列腺穿刺患者一般资料的比较
表2 两组患者穿刺阳性率及漏诊率比较[例(%)]
表3 两组行前列腺穿刺患者单针阳性率、病理组织情况及术后并发症比较
[1]
Heidenreich A, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J, et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. part ii: treatment of advanced, relapsing, and castration-resistant prostate cancer[J]. Eur Urol, 2014, 65(2): 467-479.
[2]
Presti JC. Prostate biopsy: how many cores are enough?[J]. Urol Oncol, 2003, 21(2): 135-140.
[3]
Eichler K, Hempel S, Wilby J, et al. Diagnostic value of systematic biopsy methods in the investigation of prostate cancer: a systematic review[J]. J Urol, 2006, 175(5): 1605-1612.
[4]
Harvey CJ, Pilcher J, Richenberg J, et al. Applications of transrectal ultrasound in prostate cancer[J]. Br J Radiol, 2012, 85(special_issue_1): S3-S17.
[5]
Sharma S. Imaging and intervention in prostate cancer: Current perspectives and future trends[J]. Indian J Radiol Imaging, 2014, 24(2): 139-148.
[6]
Smeenge M, Barentsz J, Cosgrove D, et al. Role of transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) in focal therapy of prostate cancer: report from a Consensus Panel[J]. BJU International, 2012, 110(7): 942-948.
[7]
Schoots IG, Roobol MJ, Nieboer D, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur Urol, 2015, 68(3): 438-450.
[8]
Ahmed HU, Hu Y, Carter T, et al. Characterizing clinically significant prostate cancer using template prostate mapping biopsy[J]. J Urol, 2011, 186(2): 458-464.
[9]
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey[J]. Ann Surg, 2004, 240(2): 205-213.
[10]
郑荣寿,孙可欣,张思维,等. 2015年中国恶性肿瘤流行情况分析[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志, 2019, 41(1): 19-28.
[11]
李星,曾晓勇. 中国前列腺癌流行病学研究进展[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2021, 48(1): 98-102.
[12]
Hricak H, Williams RD, Spring DB, et al. Anatomy and pathology of the male pelvis by magnetic resonance imaging[J]. AJR Roentgenol, 1983, 141(6): 1101.
[13]
Santoro AA, Di Gianfrancesco L, Racioppi M, et al. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate: Lights and shadows[J]. Urologia, 2021, 88(4): 280-286.
[14]
Kasivisvanathan V, Rannikko A, Borghi M. MRI-targeted or standard biopsy for prostate-cancer diagnosis[J]. N Engl J Med, 2018(378): 1767-1777.
[15]
周智恩,严维刚,周毅,等. MRI-超声融合引导下前列腺靶向穿刺活检的最新进展[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2016, 54(10): 792-796.
[16]
Wegelin O, Exterkate L, van der Leest M, et al. The FUTURE trial: a multicenter randomised controlled trial on target biopsy techniques based on magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in patients with prior negative biopsies[J]. Eur Urol, 2019, 75(4): 582-590.
[17]
张凯,张志鹏,朱刚,等. 两种核磁靶向穿刺诊断有临床意义前列腺癌精确性的比较[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(5): 293-296.
[18]
Valerio M, Donaldson I, Emberton M, et al. Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging–ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy: a systematic review[J]. Eur Urol, 2015, 68(1): 8-19.
[19]
Kasivisvanathan V, Stabile A, Neves JB, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy versus systematic biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur Urol, 2019, 76(3): 284-303.
[20]
Puech P, Rouvière O, Renard-Penna R, et al. Prostate cancer diagnosis: multiparametric mr-targeted biopsy with cognitive and transrectal us-mr fusion guidance versus systematic biopsy-prospective multicenter study[J]. Radiology, 2013, 268(2): 461-469.
[21]
Boesen L. Magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound image fusion guidance of prostate biopsies: current status, challenges and future perspectives[J]. Scand J Urol, 2019, 53(2-3): 89-96.
[22]
胡正明,崔立刚,王金锐,等. 前列腺MRI-TRUS融合成像引导靶向穿刺活检的前瞻性研究[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2015, 31(10): 930-932.
[23]
Ryan J, Broe M P, Moran D, et al. Prostate cancer detection with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/cognitive fusion biopsy: Comparing standard and targeted prostate biopsy with final prostatectomy histology[J]. Can Urol Assoc J, 2021, 15(9): E483-E487.
[1] 方晔, 谢晓红, 罗辉. 品管圈在提高前列腺癌穿刺检出率中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 722-727.
[2] 曹建辉, 徐栋, 冯斌, 郑俊彪, 黄伟伟. 超声造影在不同前列腺特异抗原含量前列腺癌穿刺活检中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(03): 307-312.
[3] 刘敏, 郑玮, 刘颖, 裴小青, 韩峰, 林僖, 周建华, 李安华. 经直肠三维超声诊断直肠黏液腺癌与非黏液腺癌的配对病例对照研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(04): 337-343.
[4] 李腾成, 谭益元, 黄群雄, 吴杰英, 肖恒军, 胡成, 李茂胤, 高新, 狄金明. 机器人腹腔镜后入路完全筋膜内根治性前列腺切除术治疗早期前列腺癌[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 452-456.
[5] 梅津熠, 王燕, 瞿旻, 董振阳, 周增辉, 沈显琦, 李嘉伦, 高旭. 机器人前列腺癌根治术中"膀胱外中叶"的处理[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 429-433.
[6] 蔡蓝蝶, 何君伟, 胡萍, 潘俊, 汤桂兴, 白遵光. 前列腺小细胞癌三例诊疗分析并文献复习[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 397-402.
[7] 李腾成, 狄金明. 2023 V1版前列腺癌NCCN指南更新要点解读[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 313-318.
[8] 单兴利, 王栋, 邢念增, 肖泽均, 李亚健. 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT对前列腺癌盆腔淋巴结转移诊断价值的研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 214-218.
[9] 谢秋波, 周宇, 宋健, 涂忠, 李想, 汪仁昊, 伍依依, 潘铁军. 全息影像在机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术中保留膀胱颈的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 209-213.
[10] 邵浩仁, 郭佳. 铁死亡的分子机制及其在前列腺癌治疗中的研究进展[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 294-298.
[11] 郑嘉裕, 吴建杰, 李小娟, 曾恒达, 李国邦, 黄炯煅, 温星桥. hsa_circ_0090923在前列腺癌中的表达及其对前列腺癌细胞增殖和迁移的调控[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 276-283.
[12] 张可, 蒋伟, 黎卓君, 毛伟斌, 张悦, 孟占鳌. 尿液前列腺癌基因(PCA3)联合多参数磁共振对前列腺癌的诊断价值[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(06): 463-466.
[13] 秦露平, 吕杰, 李名钊, 李建芳, 谢良骏, 李锦萍, 程木华. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT延迟显像探测前列腺癌根治术后盆腔复发的价值[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 378-382.
[14] 张磊磊, 陆敏华, 马功朝, 李名钊. 初诊早泄患者精囊腺经直肠超声的形态学特征[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(03): 244-247.
[15] 赵文毅, 邹冰子, 蔡冠晖, 刘永志, 温红. 超声应变力弹性成像联合MRI-DWI靶向引导穿刺在前列腺病变诊断中的应用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 988-994.
阅读次数
全文


摘要