切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (03) : 296 -299. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2024.03.018

MDT精选病例

广东省医学会泌尿外科疑难病例多学科会诊(第14期)——左肾盂恶性肿瘤并左肾巨大积液
邓楠1, 刘平1,()   
  1. 1. 510150 广东,广州医科大学附属第三医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-08 出版日期:2024-06-01
  • 通信作者: 刘平

Multidisciplinary consultation on difficult cases in Urology of the Guangdong Medical Association (Phase 14): Malignant tumor of the left renal pelvis and massive hydronephrosis of the left kidney

Nan Deng1, Ping Liu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangdong 510150, China.
  • Received:2024-03-08 Published:2024-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Ping Liu
引用本文:

邓楠, 刘平. 广东省医学会泌尿外科疑难病例多学科会诊(第14期)——左肾盂恶性肿瘤并左肾巨大积液[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 296-299.

Nan Deng, Ping Liu. Multidisciplinary consultation on difficult cases in Urology of the Guangdong Medical Association (Phase 14): Malignant tumor of the left renal pelvis and massive hydronephrosis of the left kidney[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(03): 296-299.

本文报道一例因发现左肾巨大积液继而确诊左肾盂恶性肿瘤的病例。患者因"头晕伴记忆力减退3月余,左侧腰痛、排尿困难2 d"入广州医科大学附属第三医院就诊。CT显示左肾巨大积水,行左肾穿刺造瘘后症状缓解出院。后于外院行PET-CT显示左肾上组肾盏区域两枚结节状代谢增高影,倾向于尿路上皮癌。遂再次入我院泌尿外科,左肾造瘘引流液的液基细胞学可见异型细胞,考虑高级别尿路上皮癌。因患者年龄较大,基础疾病多,与患方沟通后决定予免疫治疗。患者于我院先后行5次"替雷利珠单抗"免疫治疗。经过治疗后,患者肿瘤缩小,引流液、尿液颜色变清,无肉眼血尿。经广东省医学会泌尿外科疑难病例多学科会诊,专家建议可再次与患方沟通行根治性手术,免疫治疗为可选择方案。经与患方沟通后,患方考虑继续采用免疫治疗。继续免疫治疗3次后,复查尿液液基细胞学阴性。治疗过程中患者无明显不良反应。因此,对于高龄、基础疾病较多、一般情况较差的上尿路尿路上皮癌患者,除根治性手术外,免疫单药治疗为可选择的治疗方案。

This article reports a case of diagnosed left renal pelvis malignant tumor due to the discovery of massive fluid accumulation in the left kidney. The patient was admitted to the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University for treatment due to dizziness and memory loss for more than 3 months, left lower back pain, and difficulty urinating for 2 days. CT scan showed huge hydronephrosis in the left kidney. Symptoms improved after left kidney puncture and fistula, and the patient was discharged. Later, a PET-CT scan was performed in an external hospital, revealing two nodular metabolic hyperintensities in the renal calyx area of the upper left kidney, indicating a tendency towards urothelial carcinoma. Upon re admission to the Urology department of our hospital, atypical cells were observed in the liquid based cytology of the left renal fistula drainage fluid, suggesting high-grade urothelial carcinoma. Considering that the patient is older and has multiple underlying diseases, after communicating with the patient, immunotherapy has been decided. The patient underwent 5 rounds of immunotherapy with Tirizizumab in our hospital. After treatment, the patient's tumor shrank, the color of the drainage fluid and urine became clear, and there was no visible hematuria. After multidisciplinary consultations on difficult cases in the urology department of Guangdong Medical Association, experts suggest that the patient undergo radical surgery again, and immunotherapy is an optional option. After communicating with the patient, they consider continuing immunotherapy. After continuing immunotherapy three times, the urine based cytology test was negative. During the treatment process, the patient had no significant adverse reactions. Therefore, for elderly patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma who have multiple underlying diseases and generally poor conditions, immune monotherapy is an optional treatment option in addition to curative surgery.

图1 左肾盂恶性肿瘤患者CT检查结果注:a为初诊时CT提示左肾巨大积液;b为左肾穿刺引流后复查腹部CT(左肾积液较前改善,输尿管扩张较前减轻);c为外院PET-CT提示左肾盂肿瘤;d为3次免疫治疗后复查腹部CT,提示左侧上肾盏区域癌结节缩小;e为10次免疫治疗后复查PET-CT,未见明显恶性肿瘤征象
图2 左肾盂恶性肿瘤患者液基细胞学病理结果注:a为初诊时左肾穿刺造瘘引流液液基细胞学;b为4次免疫治疗后复查引流液液基细胞学检查,免疫组化:CK20(-)、CK7(+)、P53(异常核表达)、GATA3(+)、PSA(-)、PAX8(-)
[1]
Khazaeli Najafabadi M, Mirzaeian E, Memar Montazerin S, et al. Role of GATA3 in tumor diagnosis: a review[J]. Pathol Res Pract, 2021, 226: 153611.
[2]
Raggi D, Moschini M, Necchi A. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy: the next gold standard before radical surgery for urothelial cancer[J]. Eur Urol Open Sci, 2021, 30: 34-36.
[3]
Dursun F, MacKay A, Guzman JCA, et al. Utilization and outcomes of metastasectomy for patients with metastatic urothelial cancer: an analysis of the national cancer database[J]. Urol Oncol, 2022, 40(2): 61.e21-61.e61.e28.
[4]
Cathomas R, Lorch A, Bruins HM, et al. The 2021 updated European Association of Urology Guidelines on metastatic urothelial carcinoma[J]. Eur Urol, 2022, 81(1): 95-103.
[5]
Stadler JC, Belloum Y, Deitert B, et al. Current and future clinical applications of ctDNA in immuno-oncology[J]. Cancer Res, 2022, 82(3): 349-358.
[6]
Piombino C, Tonni E, Oltrecolli M, et al. Immunotherapy in urothelial cancer: current status and future directions[J]. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther, 2023, 23(11): 1141-1155.
[7]
Balar AV, Kamat AM, Kulkarni GS, et al. Pembrolizumab monotherapy for the treatment of high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer unresponsive to BCG (KEYNOTE-057): an open-label, single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 study[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2021, 22(7): 919-930.
[8]
Powles T, Csőszi T, Özgüroğlu M, et al. Pembrolizumab alone or combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma (KEYNOTE-361): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2021, 22(7): 931-945.
[9]
Bellmunt J, de Wit R, Fradet Y, et al. Putative biomarkers of clinical benefit with pembrolizumab in advanced urothelial cancer: results from the KEYNOTE-045 and KEYNOTE-052 landmark trials[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2022, 28(10): 2050-2060.
[10]
Balar AV, Castellano DE, Grivas P, et al. Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in metastatic urothelial carcinoma: results from KEYNOTE-045 and KEYNOTE-052 after up to 5 years of follow-up[J]. Ann Oncol, 2023, 34(3): 289-299.
[11]
Kurosaki T, Chamoto K, Suzuki S, et al. The combination of soluble forms of PD-1 and PD-L1 as a predictive marker of PD-1 blockade in patients with advanced cancers: a multicenter retrospective study[J]. Front Immunol, 2023, 14: 1325462.
[12]
Rudin CM, Pandha HS, Zibelman M, et al. Phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation study on the safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of intravenous Coxsackievirus A21 (V937), with or without pembrolizumab, in patients with advanced solid tumors[J]. J Immunother Cancer, 2023, 11(1): e005007.
[13]
Sano T, Aizawa R, Ito K, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of second-line pembrolizumab with radiation therapy in advanced urothelial carcinoma[J]. Anticancer Res, 2023, 43(5): 2119-2126.
[14]
Galsky MD, Arija JáA, Bamias A, et al. Atezolizumab with or without chemotherapy in metastatic urothelial cancer (IMvigor130): a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet, 2020, 395(10236): 1547-1557.
[15]
Liu X, Lang Y, Chai Q, et al. Atezolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy for metastatic urothelial cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2022, 13: 872196.
[16]
Zhang PF, Wen F, Wu Q J, et al. Atezolizumab with chemotherapy in first-line treatment for metastatic urothelial cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis[J]. J Comp Eff Res, 2022, 11(14): 1021-1030.
[17]
Grande E, Bamias A, Galsky MD, et al. Overall survival by response to first-line induction treatment with Atezolizumab plus Platinum-based Chemotherapy or Placebo plus Platinum-based Chemotherapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma[J]. Eur Urol Open Sci, 2023, 58: 28-36.
[18]
Chierigo F, Wenzel M, Würnschimmel C, et al. Immuno-oncology therapy in metastatic bladder cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis[J]. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 2022, 169: 103534.
[19]
Fenor de la Maza MD, Villacampa G, Miñana B, et al. First-line management of metastatic urothelial cancer: current and future perspectives after the EV-302 and CheckMate-901 studies[J]. Clin Genitourin Cancer, 2023: S1558-S7673(23)00267-7.
[20]
Rodriguez-Vida A, Perez-Gracia JL, Bellmunt J. Immunotherapy combinations and sequences in urothelial cancer: facts and hopes[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2018, 24(24): 6115-6124.
[21]
van Dijk N, Gil-Jimenez A, Silina K, et al. Preoperative ipilimumab plus nivolumab in locoregionally advanced urothelial cancer: the NABUCCO trial[J]. Nat Med, 2020, 26(12): 1839-1844.
[22]
Bajorin DF, Witjes JA, Gschwend JE, et al. Treatment of muscle-invasive urothelial cancer with nivolumab (CheckMate 274 study): aplain language summary[J]. Future Oncol, 2023, 19(6): 413-426.
[1] 陈文艳, 汪云, 魏松之. 晚期三阴性乳腺癌的精准治疗[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 78-84.
[2] 赵丽, 蔡瑞明, 赵纪强, 林民专, 陈志勇, 彭娟. 肾移植术后新发泌尿系统恶性肿瘤二例并文献复习[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 35-39.
[3] 邓永豪, 曹嘉正. 长链非编码RNA与肾癌的关系及其在肾癌中的临床应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 289-293.
[4] 黄兴, 王蕾, 夏丹. 靶向免疫治疗时代下减瘤性肾切除术在转移性肾细胞癌治疗中的价值[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 208-213.
[5] 黄艺承, 梁海祺, 何其焕, 韦发烨, 杨舒博, 谭舒婷, 翟高强, 程继文. 机器学习模型评估RAS亚家族基因对膀胱癌免疫治疗的作用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 131-140.
[6] 谭智勇, 付什, 李宁, 王海峰, 王剑松. 膀胱小细胞癌发病机制及其诊疗研究进展[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 183-187.
[7] 黄洪, 徐庆春, 马凯群, 陈麒升, 周奕洲, 李雁锋, 曹思哲, 张永海. 广东省医学会泌尿外科疑难病例多学科会诊(第13期)[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 193-197.
[8] 张燕, 许丁伟, 胡满琴, 李新成, 李翱, 黄洁. 胆囊癌免疫治疗的知识图谱可视化分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 319-327.
[9] 宋燕京, 乔江春, 宋京海. 中晚期肝癌TACE联合免疫靶向转化治疗后右半肝切除术一例[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 227-230.
[10] 张占国. 靶向免疫治疗时代的肝癌肝切除术再思考[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 11-15.
[11] 朱迎, 赵征, 许达, 陆录, 殷保兵. 免疫检查点抑制剂治疗肝细胞癌的进展与展望[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 5-10.
[12] 张宇, 余灵祥, 杨永平, 赵德希, 刁广浩, 杨木易, 赵亮, 刘佳, 李鹏, 张宁, 任辉. 原发性肝癌Ⅲa期降期后肝切除临床疗效分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 78-82.
[13] 严帅, 岳志强, 赵江华, 陈琳, 吴金柱. 初始不可切除肝癌患者靶向免疫联合治疗后手术切除临床疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 83-87.
[14] 武文晓, 张大奎, 孙志刚, 韩子翰, 陈少轩, 侯智勇, 孙白龙, 介建政. pMMR/MSS型结肠癌免疫治疗效果及预后标志物研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-56.
[15] 吕泉龙, 史文杰, 孙文国. 免疫检查点抑制剂在治疗转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌中的研究进展[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 69-72.
阅读次数
全文


摘要