切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (04) : 445 -450. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2026.04.011

临床研究

吲哚菁绿荧光引导机器人辅助改良顺行腹股沟淋巴结清扫术
谢启帆1, 刘志烨1, 叶楚津1, 谢海标1, 韦琨1, 钟方千俞1,2, 蒲小勇1,()   
  1. 1510080 广州,南方医科大学附属广东省人民医院(广东省医学科学院)泌尿外科
    2510006 广州,华南理工大学医学院
  • 收稿日期:2026-04-28 出版日期:2026-08-01
  • 通信作者: 蒲小勇
  • 基金资助:
    广东省财政厅项目(KS0120220271)

Robo-assisted laparoscopic indocyanine green guided modified anterograde inguinal lymphadenectomy

Qifan Xie1, Zhiye Liu1, Chujin Ye1, Haibiao Xie1, Kun Wei1, Fangqianyu Zhong1,2, Xiaoyong Pu1,()   

  1. 1Department of Urology, Guangdong Provincial People΄s Hospital Affiliated to Southern Medical University (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Guangzhou 510080, China
    2South China University of Technology School of Medicine, Guangzhou 510006, China
  • Received:2026-04-28 Published:2026-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Xiaoyong Pu
引用本文:

谢启帆, 刘志烨, 叶楚津, 谢海标, 韦琨, 钟方千俞, 蒲小勇. 吲哚菁绿荧光引导机器人辅助改良顺行腹股沟淋巴结清扫术[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 445-450.

Qifan Xie, Zhiye Liu, Chujin Ye, Haibiao Xie, Kun Wei, Fangqianyu Zhong, Xiaoyong Pu. Robo-assisted laparoscopic indocyanine green guided modified anterograde inguinal lymphadenectomy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(04): 445-450.

目的

探讨在阴茎癌患者中用吲哚菁绿(ICG)荧光成像引导下进行机器人辅助改良顺行腹股沟淋巴结清扫的方法及疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2022年6月至2024年7月广东省人民医院收治的4例阴茎癌患者的临床资料。4例患者中位年龄61.5岁,范围52~72岁。4例临床分期均为T1期(侵犯皮下结缔组织)。术前查体及辅助检查均提示腹股沟淋巴结肿大,其中1例提示左侧盆腔淋巴结肿大,N1期2例,N2期1例,N3期1例,均无远处转移。手术方法:患者取平卧位,术前于阴茎根部注射ICG,在ICG引导下行精准腹股沟及盆腔淋巴结清扫术。

结果

4例患者手术均顺利完成,无中转开放手术,术中均无需移动机械臂系统。其中1例术中利用原套管位置进入腹腔,同期行盆腔淋巴结清扫术。4例患者共8侧手术和1侧盆腔淋巴结清扫术,每侧中位手术时间为60 min,范围50~70 min;术中出血量每侧均<10 mL。左侧腹股沟清扫淋巴结数量中位数为4枚,范围为3~14枚;右侧腹股沟清扫淋巴结数量中位数为4枚,范围为2~9枚。患者均术后10 d内伤口拆线,未发生皮肤坏死、伤口延迟愈合、蜂窝织炎等并发症。患者引流管拔除时间为5~40 d,中位时间11 d,其中1例腹股沟区出现淋巴漏,延期拔管。术后随访时间5~25个月,所有患者的原发灶、腹股沟及盆腔淋巴结均无肿瘤复发、转移。

结论

在ICG荧光引导下机器人辅助改良顺行腹股沟淋巴结清扫术可以精确区分淋巴结的位置并与周围组织准确分离,显著提高腹股沟淋巴结清扫术的疗效并减少术后并发症的发生。

Objective

To investigate the method and efficacy of robot-assisted modified antegrade inguinal lymphadenectomy guided by indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging in patients with penile cancer.

Methods

The clinical data of 4 patients with penile cancer from June 2022 to July 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. The median age of the 4 patients was 61.5 years, ranging from 52 to 72 years. Clinical stage: 4 cases were T1 (subcutaneous connective tissue invasion), preoperative physical examination and auxiliary examination showed inguinal lymph node enlargement, of which 1 case showed left pelvic lymph node enlargement, including 2 cases of N1 stage, 1 case of N2 stage and 1 case of N3 stage. No distant metastasis was observed. Surgical methods: the patient was placed in the supine position, and ICG was injected into the root of the penis before operation. Precise inguinal lymphadenectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy were performed under the guidance of ICG.

Results

All operations were successfully completed without conversion to open surgery and without the need for mobile robotic arm system. In one case, the original cannula position was used to enter the abdominal cavity, and pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed at the same time. A total of 8 operations and 1 pelvic lymphadenectomy were performed in 4 patients. The median operation time of each side was 60 min, ranging from 50 to 70 min. The intraoperative blood loss was less than 10 ml on each side. The median number of left lymph nodes dissected was 4, ranging from 3 to 14. The median number of right lymph nodes dissected was 4, ranging from 2 to 9. Stitchings were removed in all the 4 cases within 10 days after operation, and no complications such as skin necrosis, delayed wound healing, and cellulitis occurred. The drainage tube removal time of 4 cases ranged from 5 to 40 days, with a median time of 11 days. One of them had lymphatic leakage in the inguinal region and delayed removal of the tube. All patients were followed up for 5-25 months, and no tumor recurrence or metastasis was found in the primary tumor, inguinal and pelvic lymph nodes.

Conclusions

Robot-assisted modified anterograde inguinal lymphadenectomy under the guidance of ICG fluorescence can accurately distinguish the location of lymph nodes and separate them from the surrounding tissues, significantly improve the efficacy of inguinal lymph node dissection and reduce the incidence of postoperative complications.

表1 4例阴茎癌患者临床资料
图1 机器人辅助腹腔镜顺行腹股沟淋巴结清扫术套管位置(双侧)
图2 ICG荧光成像引导下腹股沟淋巴结清扫注:a为ICG显影腹股沟浅组淋巴结;b为ICG显影腹股沟深组淋巴结;ICG为吲哚菁绿
图3 阴茎癌患者术后淋巴结病理注:a为患者1术后腹股沟淋巴结病理提示淋巴结呈反应性增生,未见癌(HE染色×10);b为患者2左侧腹股沟淋巴结病理提示可见癌(HE染色×10);c为患者3术后腹股沟淋巴结病理提示淋巴结未见癌(HE染色×20);d为患者4术后腹股沟淋巴结病理提示淋巴结未见癌(HE染色×10)
表2 4例阴茎癌患者淋巴结清扫情况
[1]
卜国峰. 影响阴茎癌患者术后预后危险因素的研究[D]. 青岛: 青岛大学, 2020.
[2]
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2018, 68(6): 394-424. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21492.
[3]
Hakenberg OW, Dräger DL, Erbersdobler A, et al. The diagnosis and treatment of penile cancer[J]. Deutsches Ärzteblatt Int, 2018: 115(39): 646.. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0646.
[4]
Jacobellis U. Modified radical inguinal lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the penis: technique and results[J]. J Urol, 2003, 169(4): 1349-1352. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000048971.52053.8a.
[5]
Correa AF. Technical management of inguinal lymph-nodes in penile cancer: open versus minimal invasive[J]. Transl Androl Urol, 2021, 10(5): 2264-2271. DOI: 10.21037/tau.2020.04.02.
[6]
Cassinotti E, Boni L, Baldari L. Application of indocyanine green (ICG)-guided surgery in clinical practice: lesson to learn from other organs-an overview on clinical applications and future perspectives[J]. Updates Surg, 2023, 75(2): 357-365. DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01361-y.
[7]
Muneer A, Bandini M, Compérat E, et al. Penile cancer: ESMO-EURACAN Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up[J]. ESMO Open, 2024, 9(7): 103481. DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103481.
[8]
徐石义, 王启林, 杨宏, 等. 阴茎癌治疗中的腹股沟淋巴结清扫术[J/OL]. 泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 15(2): 92-96. DOI: 10.20020/j.CNKI.1674-7410.2023.02.20.
[9]
Clark PE, Spiess PE, Agarwal N, et al. Penile cancer[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2013, 11(5): 594-615. DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2013.0075.
[10]
Lughezzani G, Catanzaro M, Torelli T, et al. The relationship between characteristics of inguinal lymph nodes and pelvic lymph node involvement in penile squamous cell carcinoma: a single institution experience[J]. J Urol, 2014, 191(4): 977-982. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.10.140.
[11]
鲍正清, 方冬, 纪永鹏, 等. 阴茎癌腹股沟淋巴结清扫腹腔镜手术的新进展[J]. 现代泌尿外科杂志, 2018, 23(4): 309-312, 316. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-8291.2018.04.017.
[12]
Bishoff JT, Basler JW, Teichman JM, et al. Endoscopic subcutaneous modified inguinal lymph node dissection (ESMIL) for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis[J]. J Urol, 2003, 169: 78.
[13]
Josephson DY, Jacobsohn KM, Link BA, et al. Robotic-assisted endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy[J]. Urology, 2009, 73(1): 167-170. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.05.060.
[14]
王宗平, 徐一鹏, 李方印, 等. 腹腔镜下阴茎癌改良腹股沟淋巴结清扫术23例临床报道[J]. 浙江医学, 2017, 39(12): 1014-1016. DOI:10.12056/j.issn.1006-2785.2017.39.12.2017-790.
[15]
秦旭, 李港, 刘译文, 等. 机器人辅助腹腔镜结合吲哚菁绿荧光显影技术在复杂性输尿管狭窄修复重建中的应用[J]. 徐州医科大学学报, 2024, 44(7): 514-519. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3882.2024.07.007.
[16]
吴哲境, 李敬东, 熊永福, 等. 吲哚菁绿在解剖性肝切除术中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(1): 25-29. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2025002.
[17]
冯其柱, 徐喆, 孙杰, 等. 经外周静脉和胆囊注射吲哚菁绿在腹腔镜困难胆囊切除术中应用效果对比[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2024, 40(11): 1537-1541, 1548. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2024.11.012.
[18]
Cassinotti E, Al-Taher M, Antoniou SA, et al. European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) consensus on Indocyanine Green (ICG) fluorescence-guided surgery[J]. Surg Endosc, 2023, 37(3): 1629-1648. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-09928-5.
[19]
Yuan P, Xie Y, Xu R, et al. Efficacy of indocyanine green fluorescence-guided inguinal lymph node dissection for penile cancer: a randomised trial[J]. BJU Int, 2024, 133(4): 442-450. DOI: 10.1111/bju.16231.
[20]
Bjurlin MA, Zhao LC, Kenigsberg AP, et al. Novel use of fluorescence lymphangiography during robotic groin dissection for penile cancer[J]. Urology, 2017, 107: 267. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.05.026.
[21]
Patel KN, Salunke A, Bakshi G, et al. Robotic-Assisted Video-Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (RAVEIL) and Video-Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (VEIL) versus Open Inguinal Lymph-Node Dissection (OILND) in carcinoma of penis: Comparison of perioperative outcomes, complications and oncological outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Urol Oncol Semin Orig Investig, 2022, 40(3): 112.e11-112.e22. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.11.010.
[22]
Gkegkes ID, Minis EE, Iavazzo C. Robotic-assisted inguinal lymphadenectomy: a systematic review[J]. J Robot Surg, 2019, 13(1): 1-8. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-018-0823-4.
[1] 彭兵. 联合血管切除重建的腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术实践与探索[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(1): 23-23.
[2] 谭进富, 管春菠, 朱文. 腹腔镜下袖状胃切除术[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 175-175.
[3] 张锰钢, 刘悦泽, 张太平. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术的关键技术和质量控制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 210-214.
[4] 杨永君, 王槐志. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术主要并发症及处理[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 215-218.
[5] 付丽坤, 崔红梅, 高福来, 乔红, 冯钟煦. 腹腔镜下胆总管探查“T”管引流术与经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术治疗继发性胆总管结石的疗效对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 226-230.
[6] 赵方, 陈廷昊, 陈泳松, 王健宇, 刘希. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术在高龄患者中的安全性及有效性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 231-234.
[7] 王学军, 唐水斌, 艾武. LCBDE与ERCP+EST分别联合LC治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 235-238.
[8] 李伟, 张伟, 崔啸晨, 张涛涛, 王海超. 腹腔镜精准肝蒂解剖法切除术与常规切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 244-247.
[9] 辛林璞, 杨敏, 杜峻峰. 腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术后常见并发症防治与管理[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 248-251.
[10] 梁前俊, 李昊, 张家龙, 邰胜, 梁朝朝. 国产精锋单孔机器人在中高危前列腺癌患者中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 413-419.
[11] 杨潇, 陈浩楠, 曹强, 于浩, 蔡令凯, 谈政烨, 李鹏超, 吕强. 俯卧位与侧卧位经腹膜外途径机器人辅助肾部分切除术治疗cT1期背侧肾门肿瘤的疗效对比[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 426-433.
[12] 吕定阳, 王玘葳, 双卫兵. 机器人辅助后腹腔镜肾部分切除术的技巧体会[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 383-388.
[13] 刘志烨, 谢启帆, 叶楚津, 谢海标, 韦琨, 钟方千俞, 蒲小勇. 后入路联合外侧入路在机器人辅助膀胱癌根治术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 261-266.
[14] 张鹏, 舒芳, 肖赟, 吴书清, 钟斌. 针式抓钳辅助单孔腹腔镜在治疗小儿腹股沟嵌顿斜疝中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 334-340.
[15] 席雅楠, 姚国栋, 郭秀珍, 高斌礼, 赵渊, 李婷, 钟李岩, 李梦倩. IDEAS模式对机器人辅助结直肠癌根治术患者康复结局的影响[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 285-291.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?