Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition) ›› 2017, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (05): 315-318. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2017.05.006

Special Issue:

• Clinical Researches • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparsion of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery for residual kidney stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Qiang Yuan1, Dan Du1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, the Second People's Hospital of the Three Gorges University of Medicine, Yichang 443002, China
  • Received:2016-11-19 Online:2017-10-01 Published:2017-10-01
  • Contact: Dan Du
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Du Dan, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To compare the effect and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of complex kidney stones after one stage percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Method

The clinical data of 73 patients with residual kidney stone in our hospital from September 2015 to December 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. These patients previously treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy. These patients were divided into percutaneous nephrolithotomy group and retrograde intrarenal surgery group according to surgical method. Stone clearance rate, operation time, intraoperative hemorrhage, average hospital stay, hospitalization expense and postoperative time of taking nephrostomy tube in the two groups were compared.

Result

There were no significant differences between the two groups in age, sex, body mass index, residual stone total diameter and residual stone location. The intraoperative hemorrhage was (60±17) ml vs (12±6) ml, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.01). The operation time was (35±4) min vs (60±13) min, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.01). The hospitalization expense was (17 118±1 719) yuan vs (24 026±1 013) yuan, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.01). The average hospital stays was (9.0±1.0) d vs (4.0±0.8) d, the difference was statisticallysignificant (P<0.01). The postoperative time of taking nephrostomy tube was (6.2±0.7) d vs (2.8±0.8) d, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.01). The residual stone clearance rate was 73.6% (25/34) vs 92.3% (36/39), the difference was statistically significant (P=0.031). Three patients occurred severe infection after operation in PCNL group, one patient occurred intraoperative massive hemorrhage who was cured by sensitive antibiotic and selective renal artery embolization.

Conclusion

RIRS is a better procedure for treating residual calculi after one stage PCNL, it has higher stone clearance rate, less intraoperative hemorrhage, less postoperative complications, shorter average hospital stay and postoperative time of taking nephrostomy. It was worth to promote in clinical.

Key words: Complex, kidney stones, Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, Ureterscope

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-85252990 E-mail: chinendourology@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd