Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (03): 309-314. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2025.03.005

• Clinical Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of transurethral en-bloc resection and transurethral resection of bladder tumor for the treatment of high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer

Wenhao Zhan1, Ren Liu1, Xiaolan Zeng1, Junxing Chen1, Zongren Wang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital,Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510000, China
  • Received:2024-05-13 Online:2025-06-01 Published:2025-04-22
  • Contact: Zongren Wang

Abstract:

Objective

To compare the clinical efficacy of en-bloc resection of bladder tumor(ERBT) with transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) in the comprehensive preservation of bladder treatment for high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the data of 104 patients with high-risk NMIBC from November 2016 to September 2022 in the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University.Among them,62 patients received ERBT and 42 patients received TURBT.The recurrence-free survival (RFS),recurrence rate, progression rate, and bladder preservation rate were compared between the two groups.

Results

There was no significant difference in demographic data between the two groups (P>0.05).The median recurrence-free survival was 30(20, 49) months in the ERBT group and 19(9, 49) months in the TURBT group.The recurrence rate was 16.1% in the ERBT group and 57.1% in the TURBT group.The progression rate was 4.8% in the ERBT group and 9.5% in the TURBT group.The bladder preservation rate was 96.8% in the ERBT group and 95.2% in the TURBT group.There were statistically significant differences in recurrence-free survival time and recurrence rate between the two groups(P<0.05).However, no significant difference was observed in progression rate between the groups(P>0.05).

Conclusion

Patients in the ERBT group had a lower recurrence rate and longer recurrencefree survival compared with those in the TURBT group.ERBT has more advantages than TURBT in bladder-preserving treatment of high-risk NMIBC patients.

Key words: Bladder cancer, En bloc resection of bladder tumor, Bladder sparing, Holmium laser, Recurrence-free survival (RFS)

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-85252990 E-mail: chinendourology@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd