Application of animated video in urological training with DaVinci robot

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2017.05.014

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective

To evaluate the effect of animated video of Da Vinci robotic surgery applied in the training program of the department of urology.

Methods

Clinical data of 150 patients undergoing Da Vinci robotic surgery in the urology department between March 2015 and May 2017 were collected. Before May 2016, the nurses receiving traditional teaching training were assigned into the control group. After May 2016, the nurses attending traditional teaching training combined with animated video were assigned into the experimental group. The effect of surgical cooperation, degree of satisfaction of nurses and surgeons were compared between two groups.

Results

In the experimental group, the success rate of the first insertion, mean time of body posture adjustment, mean time of machine adjustment, mean operation time, score of posture assessment, degree of satisfaction of nurses and surgeons were 94.67% (71/75), (8±4) min, (20±5) min, (166±63) min, (95±10) points, 98.57% and 95.67%, significantly differing from 82.67% (62/75), (15±5) min, (41±10) min, (213±78) min, (87±10) points, 90.34% and 89.86% in the control group (t/χ²=7.574,14.310,13.416,5.238,4.257,5.128 and 4.564; all P<0.01). Da Vinci robotic surgery was successfully performed in 150 patients. No postoperative complications were observed during subsequent follow-up.

Conclusion

The animated video training can effectively enhance the effect on body posture and machine adjustment, shorten the mean time of body posture and machine adjustment and reduce the operation time, thereby improving the nursing quality and working efficiency in the operating room.

Key words: Video, Da Vinci robotic, Surgical posture, Safety management

Fengqiu Gong, Liying Ding, Xiaojun Chen, Dianye Yao, Yaoye Wu, Lihong Xie, Qiuyi Ouyang, Ping Wang, Wei Chen. Application of animated video in urological training with DaVinci robot[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2017, 11(05): 349-354.

/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://zhqjmnmwkzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2017.05.014

https://zhqjmnmwkzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/Y2017/V11/I05/349

Figures/Tables 4

References 18

[1]	Syed K A,Blankstein M,Bhandari M, et al. The effect of patient position during trauma surgery on fat embolism syndrome: An experimental study[J]. Indian J Orthop, 2014, 48(2): 203-210.
[2]	Mechanic E. Anterior tooth challenges, part 4: canines in the lateral position[J]. Dent Today, 2014, 33(3): 84, 86-89.
[3]	El D H,Lord B,Amis A, et al. Assessment of pose repeatability and specimen repositioning of a robotic joint testing platform[J]. Med Eng Phys, 2017, pii: S1350-4533(17)30150-9.
[4]	Kubo N,Ohira M,Yamashita Y, et al. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position versus in the lateral position for patients with esophageal cancer: a comparison of short-term surgical results[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2014, 24(2): 158-163.
[5]	郑燕芳,卫冰,张鑫, 等. 应用达芬奇机器人实施腹部外科疑难手术的护理[J]. 护理学杂志, 2011(18): 38-39.
[6]	Hong DG,Lee YS,Park NY, et al. Robotic uterine artery preservation and nerve-sparing radical trachelectomy with bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy in early-stage cervical cancer[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2011, 21(2): 391-396.
[7]	沈周俊, 何威, 王浩飞, 等. 机器人辅助腹腔镜下肾上腺、肾脏、膀胱、前列腺等手术[Z]. 中国陕西西安: 2010.
[8]	Ficarra V,Novara G,Dasgupta P. Robot-assisted vs open radical prostatectomy: the day after[J]. BJU Int, 2017, 120(3):308-309.
[9]	王芸,李萍. 达芬奇机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术患者围手术期护理[J]. 护理实践与研究, 2016, 13(19): 41-42.
[10]	丁华,赵明,赵姗. 机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术围手术期护理[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2009, 15(9): 832-833.
[11]	过菲,杨波,王辉清, 等. 激光引导泊机装置在机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术中的应用[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志:电子版, 2015, 9(5): 320-323.
[12]	王莉敏,缪燕,孔晓明, 等. 视频教育对自我注射胰岛素糖尿病患者手卫生知识和行为的影响[J]. 现代临床护理, 2015(11): 56-59.
[13]	丁丽英,陈小俊,余华, 等. 动漫视频在老年硬膜外麻醉术前访视中的应用研究[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2017, 33(2): 102-105.
[14]	Barletta F,Corrado G,Vizza E. A comparison between laparotomy, laparoscopy and robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy in surgical treatment of early stage cervical cancer[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2015, 22(6S): S48.
[15]	仲正香,袁建红,尹恩静. 标准手术体位安置的护理进展[J]. 当代护士:专科版旬刊, 2012 (12): 18-20.
[16]	Spampinato M G,Coratti A,Bianco L, et al. Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic and robot-assisted major hepatectomies: an Italian multi-institutional comparative study[J]. Surg Endosc, 2014, 28(10): 2973-2979.
[17]	王勉,李前进,郑建勇, 等. 达芬奇机器人与腹腔镜手术在直肠癌根治术中的病例对比研究[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2015, 4(1): 40-44.
[18]	任竹. 动漫视频在农业科普教育与技术推广中的应用[J]. 农技服务, 2012, 29(6): 758.

项目	例数	医师满意度	护士满意度	体位考核成绩（分，±s）
试验组	75	95.67%	98.57%	95±100
对照组	75	89.86%	90.34%	87±10
统计值	?	χ²=4.564	χ²=5.128	t=4.257
P值	?	<0.01	<0.01	<0.01

项目	例数	医师满意度	护士满意度	体位考核成绩（分，±s）
试验组	75	95.67%	98.57%	95±100
对照组	75	89.86%	90.34%	87±10
统计值	?	χ²=4.564	χ²=5.128	t=4.257
P值	?	<0.01	<0.01	<0.01

项目	例数	手术体位摆置时间（min，±s）	泊机时间（min，±s）	入位一次性成功率[例（%）]	手术操作时间（min，±s）
试验组	75	08±4	20±5	71（94.67）	166±63
对照组	75	15±5	41±10	62（82.67）	213±78
统计值	?	t=14.310	t=13.416	χ²=7.574	t=5.238
P值	?	<0.01	<0.01	<0.01	<0.01

项目	例数	手术体位摆置时间（min，±s）	泊机时间（min，±s）	入位一次性成功率[例（%）]	手术操作时间（min，±s）
试验组	75	08±4	20±5	71（94.67）	166±63
对照组	75	15±5	41±10	62（82.67）	213±78
统计值	?	t=14.310	t=13.416	χ²=7.574	t=5.238
P值	?	<0.01	<0.01	<0.01	<0.01

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export