切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (01) : 16 -20. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2020.01.005

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

前列腺癌根治术中尿道后筋膜重建技术对尿控能力影响的荟萃分析
拜合提亚·阿扎提1, 玉苏甫·艾比布力1, 王文光1, 王玉杰1,()   
  1. 1. 830054 新疆医科大学第一附属医院
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-17 出版日期:2020-02-01
  • 通信作者: 王玉杰

The influence of posterior reconstruction technique on continence during prostatectomy: a Meta-analysis

Hetiyaazati Bai1, Sufuaibibuli Yu1, Wenguang Wang1, Yujie Wang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of urology, the first Afflicated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830054, china
  • Received:2018-03-17 Published:2020-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Yujie Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang yujie, Email:
引用本文:

拜合提亚·阿扎提, 玉苏甫·艾比布力, 王文光, 王玉杰. 前列腺癌根治术中尿道后筋膜重建技术对尿控能力影响的荟萃分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(01): 16-20.

Hetiyaazati Bai, Sufuaibibuli Yu, Wenguang Wang, Yujie Wang. The influence of posterior reconstruction technique on continence during prostatectomy: a Meta-analysis[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(01): 16-20.

目的

探讨前列腺癌根治术中尿道后筋膜重建技术对术后尿控的影响。

方法

检索Pubmed,Embase,Cochrane Library,Web of Science,CNKI和万方等数据库,查找比较前列腺癌根治术中尿道后筋膜重建和传统前列腺癌根治术后尿控能力的研究,检索时限均从建库至2018年1月31日。采用Review Manager 5.3软件进行Meta分析。

结果

共纳入22篇文献,其中随机对照研究有3篇,前瞻性观察研究有5篇,回顾性研究有14篇;共纳入的患者3 594例,其中尿道后筋膜重建的患者2 021例,标准前列腺癌根治术的患者1 573例。拔出尿管后3~7 d、30 d、90 d、180 d尿控率,尿道后筋膜重建组优于标准手术组(OR=3.14,3.15,3.01,2.5;P<0.05);防止尿漏发生方面重建组优于标准手术组(OR=0.39,P<0.05);而拔出尿管后24 h尿控,切缘阳性率、急性尿潴留发生、吻合口狭窄发生率,勃起功能保护率两组间差异无统计学意义(OR=1.66,1.03,1.38,0.50,1.45;P>0.05)。

结论

前列腺癌根治术中尿道后筋膜重建可提高患者尿控早期恢复,还能减少尿漏发生,而在保证切缘阴性,急性尿潴留发生,吻合口狭窄等方面跟标准前列腺癌根治术一样具有安全性。

Objective

To evaluate the influence of posterior musculofascial plate reconstruction on early return of continence after radical prostatectomy.

Methods

A systematic research of the electronic databases including Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Scince, CNKI and Wanfang database (from the data of their establishments to January 2018) was given about studies which had compared early return of continence between posterior musculofascial plate reconstruction prostatectomy and conventional prostatectomy. A Meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.3 software.

Results

A total of 22 clinical studies were enrolled, including 3 randomised controlled trials, 5 prospective studies and 14 retrospective studies. A total of 3 594 patients, of whom 2 021 were reconstruction group and the other 1 573 were standard group. Reconstruction group is beneficial than standard group in 3-7 d, 30 d, 90 d, 180 d continence (OR=3.14, 3.15, 3.01, 2.5; P<0.05) and escaping urinary leakage (OR=0.39, P<0.05) after radical prostatectomy. There was no difference in 24 h continence, positive surgical margins, urinary retention, erectile function and bladder neck stricture (OR=1.66, 1.03, 1.38, 0.50, 1.45; P>0.05).

Conclusions

Reconstruction technique is benificial for urinary continence and escaping urinary leakage than standard prostotactomy, and has the same safty on positive surgical margins, urinary retention, erectile function and bladderneck stricture compared with standard prostatectomy.

表1 尿道后筋膜重建前列腺癌根治述与传统组尿控能力比较的相关文献检索情况
[1]
Penson DF. Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate- Cancer Survivors [J]. N Engl J Med, 2008, 359(2): 200-201.
[2]
Ficarraab V, Rosen RC, Artibani W, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy[J]. Eur Urol, 2012, 62(3): 405-417.
[3]
Rocco F, Gadda F, Acquati P, et al. Personal research: reconstruction of the urethral striated sphincter[J]. Arch Ital Urol Androl, 2001, 73(3): 127-137.
[4]
Rocco F, Carmignani L, Acquati P, et al. Restoration of posterior aspect of rhabdosphincter shortens continence time after radical retropubic prostatectomy[J]. J Urol, 2006, 175(6): 2201-2206.
[5]
Volkan T, Can SN, Selcuk S, et al. Immediate continence rates in ralrp: a comparison of three techniques [J]. Jsls, 2016, 20(4): pii: e2016.00058.
[6]
Anceschi U, Gaffi M, Molinari C, et al. Posterior reconstruction and outcomes of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a high-risk setting[J]. JSLS, 2013, 17(4): 535-542.
[7]
Jr SV, Vidlar A, Grepl M, et al. Advanced reconstruction of vesicourethral support (ARVUS) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: one-year functional outcomes in a two-group randomised controlled trial[J]. Eur Urol, 2017, 71(5): 822-830.
[8]
Ito K, Kenji S, Yoshii H, et al. Modified posterior musculofascial plate reconstruction decreases the posterior vesicourethral angle and improves urinary continence recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy[J]. Mol Clin Oncol, 2013, 1(6): 970-976.
[9]
Jeong W C, Oh JJ, Jeong JS,et al. Novel posterior reconstruction technique during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: description and comparative outcomes[J]. Int J Urol, 2012, 19(7): 683-687.
[10]
Kim, Hwang E A, Chinedu M, et al. Impact of posterior urethral plate repair on continence following robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy[J]. Yonsei Med J, 2010, 51(3): 427-431.
[11]
Rocco F, Carmignani L, Acquati P, et al. Early continence recovery after open radical prostatectomy with restoration of the posterior aspect of the rhabdosphincter[J]. Eur Urol, 2007, 52(2): 376-383.
[12]
Sano T, Nakashima M, Haitani T, et al. Posterior musculofascial plate reconstruction promotes early restoration of continence and prevents severe incontinence in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy[J]. Int J Urol, 2012, 19(5): 475-479.
[13]
You YC, Kim TH, Sung GT. Effect of bladder neck preservation and posterior urethral reconstruction during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for urinary continence[J]. Korean J Urol, 2012, 53(1): 29-33.
[14]
Brien JC, Barone B, Fabrizio M, et al. Posterior reconstruction before vesicourethral anastomosis in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy leads to earlier return to baseline continence[J]. J Endourol, 2011, 25(3): 441-445.
[15]
Joshi N, De BW, Van ME, et al. Impact of posterior musculofascial reconstruction on early continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: results of a prospective parallel group trial[J]. Eur Urol, 2010, 58(1): 84-89.
[16]
Jeong CW, Lee JK, Oh JJ, et al. Effects of new 1-step posterior reconstruction method on recovery of continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: results of a prospective, single-blind, parallel group, randomized, controlled trial[J]. J Urol, 2014, 193(3): 935-942.
[17]
Sutherland DE, Linder B, Guzman AM, et al. Posterior rhabdosphincter reconstruction during robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: results from a phase II randomized clinical trial[J]. J Urol, 2009, 181(4): 1262-1267.
[18]
Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Orvieto MA, et al. Influence of modified posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter on early recovery of continence and anastomotic leakage rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy[J]. Eur Urol, 2011, 59(1): 72-80.
[19]
Nguyen MM, Kamoi K, Stein RJ, et al. Early continence outcomes of posterior musculofascial plate reconstruction during robotic and laparoscopic prostatectomy[J]. BJU Int,2008,101(9): 1135-1139.
[20]
Simone G, Papalia R, Ferriero M,et al. Laparoscopic "single knot-single running" suture vesico-urethral anastomosis with posterior musculofascial reconstruction[J]. World J Urol, 2012, 30(5): 651-657.
[21]
Menon M, Muhletaler F, Campos M, et al. Assessment of early continence after reconstruction of the periprostatic tissues in patients undergoing computer assisted (robotic) prostatectomy: results of a 2 group parallel randomized controlled trial[J]. J Urol, 2008, 180(3): 1018-1023.
[22]
Tewari A, Jhaveri J, Rao S, et al. Total reconstruction of the vesicourethral junction[J]. BJU Int, 2008, 101(7): 871-887.
[23]
Daouacher G, Waldén M. A simple reconstruction of the posterior aspect of rhabdosphincter and sparing of puboprostatic collar reduces the time to early continence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy[J]. J Endourol, 2014, 28(4): 481.
[24]
Rocco B, Gregori A, Stener S, et al. Posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter allows a rapid recovery of continence after transperitoneal videolaparoscopic radical prostatectomy[J]. Eur Urol, 2007, 51(4): 996-1003.
[25]
汤桂兴,王树声,古炽明, 等. 盆底筋膜保护与重建对腹腔镜下前列腺癌根治术后早期控尿的影响[J]. 现代泌尿生殖肿瘤杂志, 2016, 8(3): 145-149.
[26]
Tholomier C, Bienz M, Hueber P A, et al. Oncological and functional outcomes of 722 robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) cases: The largest Canadian 5-year experience[J]. Can Urol Assoc J, 2014, 8(5-6): 195-201.
[27]
Novara G, Ficarra V. AdVance Sling in Postprostatectomy Urinary Incontinence: More Data Available and Some Questions Still Open[J]. Eur Urol, 2012, 62(1): 146-147.
[28]
Ficarra V, Gan M, Borghesi M, et al. Posterior muscolofascial reconstruction incorporated into urethrovescical anastomosis during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy[J]. J Endourol, 2012, 26(12): 1542-1545.
[29]
Ficarraab V, Rosen R C, Artibani W, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy[J]. Eur Urol, 2012, 62(3): 405-417.
[30]
Kojima Y, Takahashi N, Haga N, et al. Urinary incontinence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: pathophysiology and intraoperative techniques to improve surgical outcome[J]. Int J Urol, 2013, 20(11): 1052-1063.
[1] 杨倩, 李秋洋, 李楠, 罗渝昆, 唐杰. 基于超声纹理影像转录组学预测前列腺癌[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(03): 319-326.
[2] 蒋敏, 刘馨竹, 李大伟, 冯柏塨, 申传安. 点阵CO2激光联合其他非手术方式治疗痤疮瘢痕有效性的网状荟萃分析[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 429-439.
[3] 李伟, 宋子健, 赖衍成, 周睿, 吴涵, 邓龙昕, 陈锐. 人工智能应用于前列腺癌患者预后预测的研究现状及展望[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 541-546.
[4] 祝炜安, 林华慧, 吴建杰, 黄炯煅, 吴婷婷, 赖文杰. RDM1通过CDK4促进前列腺癌细胞进展的研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 618-625.
[5] 王功炜, 李书豪, 魏松, 吕博然, 胡成. 溶瘤病毒M1对不同前列腺癌细胞杀伤效果的研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 626-632.
[6] 施一辉, 张平新, 朱勇, 杨德林. 机器人辅助前列腺根治术后切缘阳性的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 633-637.
[7] 胡思平, 熊性宇, 徐航, 杨璐. 衰老相关分泌表型因子在前列腺癌发生发展中的作用机制[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 425-434.
[8] 杨勇军, 曾一鸣, 贺显雅, 卢强, 李远伟. ASA分级≥Ⅲ级患者局麻经会阴前列腺多模态影像融合穿刺的安全性和有效性[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 441-447.
[9] 李鑫钊, 张廷涛, 朱峰, 刘金山, 刘大闯. 血纤维蛋白原、D-二聚体及碱性磷酸酶诊断前列腺癌骨转移的价值分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 459-463.
[10] 刘中文, 刘畅, 高洋, 刘东, 林世庆, 杨建华, 赵福义. 尿液microRNA-326与腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌患者预后的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 386-391.
[11] 张铭星, 刘文倩, 王以然, 赵泽恬, 袁欣怡, 丁留成. 江苏地区腹腔镜下前列腺癌根治术后一年夜尿症发生率及相关危险因素多中心回顾性研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 141-145.
[12] 孙昭, 刘琪, 王殿琛, 姜建武, 符洋. 机器人对比腹腔镜及开放式腹股沟疝修补术的Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 588-598.
[13] 陈钊, 钟克力, 江志鹏, 傅宇翔, 范宝航, 吴文飞. 前列腺癌术后腹股沟疝的发生率及危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 396-401.
[14] 李海亮, 俞云, 张星星, 陈管洁, 刘玲, 谢剑锋, 常炜. 经鼻高流量氧疗在危重症患者气管插管过程中效果的荟萃分析[J/OL]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 227-235.
[15] 张允耀, 王静, 范爱娟, 牟海萍. 超声诊断卵巢交界性肿瘤临床价值的荟萃分析[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 85-89.
阅读次数
全文


摘要