切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (01) : 88 -94. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2025.01.016

综述

肾肿瘤评分系统的研究进展
张浩洋1, 凌志新2, 许爽2, 陈浩2, 欧阳骏2,()   
  1. 1.215123 江苏,苏州大学附属第四医院泌尿外科
    2.215006 江苏,苏州大学附属第一医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-04 出版日期:2025-02-01
  • 通信作者: 欧阳骏
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助课题(82002715),江苏省自然科学基金资助课题(BK20190170)

Research progress on renal tumor scoring system

Haoyang Zhang1, Zhixin Ling2, Shuang Xu2, Hao Chen2, Jun Ouyang2,()   

  1. 1.Department of Urology, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 215123 Suzhou, China
    2.Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 215006 Suzhou, China
  • Received:2023-07-04 Published:2025-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Jun Ouyang
引用本文:

张浩洋, 凌志新, 许爽, 陈浩, 欧阳骏. 肾肿瘤评分系统的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-94.

Haoyang Zhang, Zhixin Ling, Shuang Xu, Hao Chen, Jun Ouyang. Research progress on renal tumor scoring system[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 88-94.

肾肿瘤评分系统是评估肾肿瘤复杂程度的重要工具。自R.E.N.A.L.评分问世以来,许多基于不同解剖参数的评分系统相继提出,目的是找到评估肾部分切除术可行性及其并发症风险的关键参数。本文在第一代肾肿瘤评分系统的基础上,进一步阐述了mR.E.N.A.L评分、SPARE评分、m-CI、ABCD评分、瘤周动脉评分系统、频谱评分、以肿瘤为中心的多平面重建、DDD评分、RNP评分、肾柱侵犯数目、零缺血指数、C.L.A.M.P.评分、三维肾脏评分系统和ROADS评分共14种肾肿瘤评分系统,旨在为临床医师选择合适的评分系统提供参考,并探索更简单、有效和实用的肾肿瘤评分系统。

The renal tumor scoring system is an important tool for assessing the complexity of renal tumors. Since the emergence of the R.E.N.A.L. scoring system, many scoring systems based on different anatomical parameters have been proposed to identify key parameters for evaluating the feasibility and risk of complications of partial nephrectomy. On the basis of the first-generation renal tumor scoring system, this article further elaborates on the mR E. N.A.L score, SPARE score, m-CI, ABCD score, peritumoral arterial scoring system, spectral score, tumor centered multi plane reconstruction,DDD score, RNP score, number of renal column invasions, zero ischemia index, C L. A.M.P. score, three-dimensional renal scoring system, and ROADS score, aimed at providing reference for clinicians to choose appropriate scoring systems and exploring simpler, more effective, and practical renal tumor scoring systems.

[1]
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020:GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3): 209-249.[2]Yang F, Zhou Q, Xing N. Comparison of survival and renal function between partial and radical laparoscopic nephrectomy for T1b renal cell carcinoma[J]. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2020, 146(1): 261-272.
[3]
Simmons MN, Weight CJ, Gill IS. Laparoscopic radical versus partial nephrectomy for tumors >4 Cm: intermediate-term oncologic and functional outcomes[J]. Urology, 2009, 73(5): 1077-1082.
[4]
Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size,location and depth[J]. J Urol, 2009, 182(3): 844-853.
[5]
Simhan J, Smaldone MC, Tsai KJ, et al. Objective measures of renal mass anatomic complexity predict rates of major complications following partial nephrectomy[J]. Eur Urol, 2011, 60(4): 724-730.
[6]
Kopp RP, Mehrazin R, Palazzi KL, et al. Survival outcomes after radical and partial nephrectomy for clinical T2 renal tumours categorised by R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score[J]. BJU Int, 2014,114(5): 708-718.
[7]
杨浩森, 阴克强, 双卫兵. 肾肿瘤评分系统的研究进展[J]. 现代泌尿生殖肿瘤杂志, 2019, 11(4): 252-256.Yang HS, Yin KQ, Shuang WB. Research progress of renal tumor scoring system[J]. J Contemp Urol Reprod Oncol, 2019, 11(4): 252-256.
[8]
董华朝, 任海林. 肾肿瘤评分系统的临床应用及进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2023, 13(6): 10439-10446.Dong HZ, Ren HL. Clinical application and progress of renal tumor scoring system [J]. Adv Clin Med, 2023, 13(6): 10439-10446.
[9]
Ficarra V, Novara G, Secco S, et al. Preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification of renal tumours in patients who are candidates for nephron-sparing surgery[J]. Eur Urol, 2009, 56(5): 786-793.
[10]
Simmons MN, Ching CB, Samplaski MK, et al. Kidney tumor location measurement using the C index method[J]. J Urol, 2010,183(5): 1708-1713.
[11]
Tobert CM, Shoemaker A, Kahnoski R J, et al. Critical appraisal of first-generation renal tumor complexity scoring systems: creation of a second-generation model of tumor complexity[J]. Urol Oncol, 2015,33(4): 167.e1-167.e6.
[12]
Spaliviero M, Poon B Y, Karlo C A, et al. An arterial based complexity(ABC) scoring system to assess the morbidity profile of partial nephrectomy[J]. Eur Urol, 2016, 69(1): 72-79.
[13]
Cacciamani G E, Gill T, Medina L, et al. Impact of host factors on robotic partial nephrectomy outcomes: comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Urol, 2018, 200(4): 716-730.
[14]
Simmons MN, Hillyer SP, Lee BH, et al. Diameter-axial-polar nephrometry: integration and optimization of R.E.N.A.L. and centrality index scoring systems[J]. J Urol, 2012, 188(2): 384-390.
[15]
Wang Q, Qian B, Li Q, et al. Application of modified R.E.N.A.L.nephrometry score system in evaluating the retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy for T1 renal cell carcinoma[J]. Int J Clin Exp Med,2015, 8(4): 6482-6488.
[16]
Arora S, Chun B, Ahlawat RK, et al. Conversion of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy to radical nephrectomy: a prospective multiinstitutional study[J]. Urology, 2018, 113: 85-90.
[17]
Ficarra V, Porpiglia F, Crestani A, et al. The Simplified PADUA REnal (SPARE) nephrometry system: a novel classification of parenchymal renal tumours suitable for partial nephrectomy[J]. BJU Int, 2019, 124(4): 621-628.
[18]
Diana P, Lughezzani G, Uleri A, et al. Multi-institutional retrospective validation and comparison of the simplified PADUA REnal nephrometry system for the prediction of surgical success of robotassisted partial nephrectomy[J]. Eur Urol Focus, 2021, 7(5): 1100-1106.
[19]
Weprin S, Falagario U, Veccia A, et al. Simplified PADUA renal(SPARE) nephrometry scoring system: external validation,interobserver variability, and comparison with RENAL and PADUA in a single-center robotic partial nephrectomy series[J]. Eur Urol Focus, 2021, 7(3): 591-597.
[20]
Bylund JR, Gayheart D, Fleming T, et al. Association of tumor size, location, R.E.N.A.L., PADUA and centrality index score with perioperative outcomes and postoperative renal function[J]. J Urol,2012, 188(5): 1684-1689.
[21]
沈国丽, 邵敏, 蔡如意, 等. EZSCAN风险评分在肾功能轻度损伤人群中的筛查价值[J]. 中山大学学报(医学科学版), 2023,44(1): 115-121.Shen GL, Shao M, Cai RY, et al. Value of EZSCAN for screening mild renal impairment[J]. J Sun Yat Sen Univ Med Sci, 2023, 44(1):115-121.
[22]
Ito H, Makiyama K, Kawahara T, et al. Modified C index: novel predictor of postoperative renal functional loss of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy[J]. J De L'association Des Urol Du Can, 2017, 11(5):E215-E221.
[23]
Mottrie A, Gandaglia G. Do we need a novel nephrometry scoring system in partial nephrectomy?[J]. Eur Urol, 2016, 69(1): 80-81.
[24]
Kriegmair MC, Hetjens S, Mandel P, et al. Tumor size and invasiveness matters for partial nephrectomy: external validation and modification of the arterial based complexity score[J]. J Surg Oncol,2017, 115(6): 768-774.
[25]
Zhang R, Wu G, Huang J, et al. Peritumoral artery scoring system:a novel scoring system to predict renal function outcome after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7(1): 2853.
[26]
Zhang Z, Zhao J, Dong W, et al. Acute ipsilateral renal dysfunction after partial nephrectomy in patients with a contralateral kidney:spectrum score to unmask ischemic injury[J]. Eur Urol, 2016, 70(4):692-698.
[27]
Zhang Z, Zhao J, Dong W, et al. Acute kidney injury after partial nephrectomy: role of parenchymal mass reduction and ischemia and impact on subsequent functional recovery[J]. Eur Urol, 2016, 69(4):745-752.
[28]
Lee Z, Uzzo R, Asghar A, et al. Functional parenchymal volumebased spectrum score is able to quantify ischemic injury after partial nephrectomy[J]. Urology, 2018, 120: 150-155.
[29]
Tomaszewski JJ, Smaldone MC, Cung B, et al. Internal validation of the renal pelvic score: a novel marker of renal pelvic anatomy that predicts urine leak after partial nephrectomy[J]. Urology, 2014,84(2): 351-357.
[30]
Uehara S, Yoshida S, Tanaka H, et al. Prediction of intraoperative urinary collecting system entry in patients with peripheral renal tumors undergoing partial nephrectomy: usefulness of tumor-centered multiplanar reconstruction[J]. Urol Int,2018,100(1):85-91.
[31]
Zhang ZY, Pan X, Fan Y, et al. DDD score for renal tumor: an intuitive and comprehensive anatomical scoring system to access the outcomes of retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy[J]. Int J Urol, 2019, 26(4): 451-456.
[32]
张中元, 朱军, 虞巍, 等. DDD肾肿瘤评分系统应用于肾肿瘤手术决策的临床分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(2):99-104.Zhang ZY, Zhu J, Yu W, et al. Clinical Analysis of the Application of DDD Nephrometry Score for the Surgical Decision-making Process of renal tumor[J]. Chin J Clin Electron Ed, 2019, 13(2): 99-104.
[33]
Yang B, Ma LL, Qiu M, et al. A novel nephrometry scoring system for predicting peri-operative outcomes of retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy[J]. Chin Med J, 2020, 133(5): 577-582.
[34]
Davidiuk AJ, Parker AS, Thomas CS, et al. Mayo adhesive probability score: an accurate image-based scoring system to predict adherent perinephric fat in partial nephrectomy[J]. Eur Urol, 2014,66(6): 1165-1171.
[35]
Buffi N, Lista G, Larcher A, et al. Margin, ischemia, and complications (MIC) score in partial nephrectomy: a new system for evaluating achievement of optimal outcomes in nephron-sparing surgery[J]. Eur Urol, 2012, 62(4): 617-618.
[36]
White WM, Goel RK, Haber GP, et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy without renal hilar occlusion[J]. BJU Int, 2010, 105(11): 1580-1584.
[37]
Gill I S, Patil M B, Abreu A L, et al. Zero ischemia anatomical partial nephrectomy: a novel approach[J]. J Urol, 2012, 187(3): 807-814.
[38]
Novak R, Mulligan D, Abaza R. Robotic partial nephrectomy without renal ischemia[J]. Urology, 2012, 79(6): 1296-1301.
[39]
Zhou L, Cao Y, Bian T, et al. Number of renal columns invaded by tumor: a novel parameter for predicting complexity and outcomes of off-clamp open partial nephrectomy[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2015,221(2): 539-549.e1.
[40]
Li Y, Zhou L, Bian T, et al. The zero ischemia index (ZII): a novel criterion for predicting complexity and outcomes of off-clamp partial nephrectomy[J]. World J Urol, 2017, 35(7): 1095-1102.
[41]
Wang Y, Chen C, Qin C, et al. The C.L.A.M.P. Nephrometry score: a system for preoperative assessment of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with Segmental Renal Artery Clamping[J]. Sci Rep,2018, 8: 9717.
[42]
Shao P, Qin C, Yin C, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with segmental renal artery clamping: technique and clinical outcomes[J].Eur Urol, 2011, 59(5): 849-855.
[43]
Leslie S, Gill IS, de Castro Abreu A L, et al. Renal tumor contact surface area: a novel parameter for predicting complexity and outcomes of partial nephrectomy[J]. Eur Urol, 2014, 66(5): 884-893.
[44]
Liu J, Liu J, Wang S, et al. Three-dimensional nephrometry scoring system: a precise scoring system to evaluate complexity of renal tumors suitable for partial nephrectomy[J]. PeerJ, 2020, 8: e8637.
[45]
Simone G, Tuderti G, Anceschi U, et al. “ride the green light”:indocyanine green-marked off-clamp robotic partial nephrectomy for totally endophytic renal masses[J]. Eur Urol, 2019, 75(6): 1008-1014.
[46]
Huang Q, Gu L, Zhu J, et al. A three-dimensional, anatomy-based nephrometry score to guide nephron-sparing surgery for renal sinus tumors[J]. Cancer, 2020, 126(Suppl 9): 2062-2072.
[47]
Derweesh IH, Ryan ST, Hamilton ZA. Partial nephrectomy for T1b and T2 renal masses: a subtle paradigm shift and a new synthesis[J].Cancer, 2018, 124(19): 3798-3801.
[48]
Mir MC, Derweesh I, Porpiglia F, et al. Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinical T1b and T2 renal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies[J]. Eur Urol, 2017, 71(4): 606-617.
[1] 郭馨阳, 张妍, 原韶玲, 史泽洪, 牛菁华. CT/MRI引导下再次超声检查对首次超声漏诊肾肿瘤的再评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(11): 1042-1047.
[2] 张妍, 原韶玲, 史泽洪, 郭馨阳, 牛菁华. 小肾肿瘤超声漏诊原因分析新思路[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 500-504.
[3] 刘子洋, 崔俭俭, 赵茵. 产科弥散性血管内凝血及其评分系统的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 511-518.
[4] 韦锦焕, 陈旭, 卢军, 陈炜, 罗俊航. 机器人辅助腹腔镜肾部分切除术中逆行切除技术在治疗巨大复杂肾癌中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[5] 谢汶歆, 马乐, 刘晔, 曹晓明, 张万春. 前列腺特异性膜抗原PET/CT在肾癌诊疗中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 514-519.
[6] 邓永豪, 曹嘉正. 长链非编码RNA与肾癌的关系及其在肾癌中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 289-293.
[7] 李彬瑶, 邓富铭, 高晓峰, 赵彰, 张正涛, 周锐, 朱士博, 钟竞斌, 刘国昌, 伏雯. 机器人手术系统在小儿泌尿外科的应用与进展[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 284-288.
[8] 张子旭, 郑俊炯, 罗云, 林天歆. 腹腔镜肾部分切除术离体猪肾培训模型的构建[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 277-283.
[9] 张超, 过菲, 王富博, 叶宸, 杨悦, 杨波. 腹腔镜肾部分切除术:肾癌合并肾静脉癌栓的新选择[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 219-224.
[10] 赵佳晖, 王永兴, 彭涛, 李明川, 魏德超, 韩毅力, 侯铸, 姜永光, 罗勇. 后腹腔镜根治性肾切除手术时间延长和术中出血量增多的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 575-580.
[11] 戴志红, 刘志宇. 囊性肾癌肾部分切除术的实践与思考 [J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 423-423.
[12] 宋玮, 黄修丽, 李鑫, 史雅琼, 张晔, 邓飞, 高燕. 改良衰弱指数对重症肺部感染的预后分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(01): 119-122.
[13] 孟塬, 巴合提·卡力甫, 马志刚, 王锦国, 张杰, 李玉鹏, 宋巍, 田广磊, 陈雄. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术难度评分系统在急性胆囊炎治疗中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 169-175.
[14] 胡欣芫, 杨智義, 赵成俊, 张秋雨, 张挽乾, 潘佰猛, 张灵强. 急性胰腺炎评分系统预测病情严重程度的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 239-243.
[15] 李静波, 朱嘉宁, 宋禄达, 罗渝昆, 李秋洋. 多模态超声成像技术在肾肿瘤诊断中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 349-353.
阅读次数
全文


摘要