切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (02) : 118 -121. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2017.02.010

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

术前留置双J管对输尿管软镜手术效果的影响
王昊星1, 乃比江·毛拉库尔班1, 王峰1, 宋光鲁1, 哈木拉提·吐送1, 安尼瓦尔·牙生1,()   
  1. 1. 830011 乌鲁木齐,新疆医科大学第一附属医院泌尿中心
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-30 出版日期:2017-04-01
  • 通信作者: 安尼瓦尔·牙生

Influence of preoperative indwelling double J stent on the success rate and effect of flexible ureteroscopy

Haoxing Wang1, Maolakuerban Naibijiang·1, Feng Wang1, Guanglu Song1, Tusong Hamulati·1, Yasheng Anniwaer·1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830011, China
  • Received:2016-06-30 Published:2017-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Yasheng Anniwaer·
  • About author:
    Corresponding: Anniwaer·Yasheng, Email:
引用本文:

王昊星, 乃比江·毛拉库尔班, 王峰, 宋光鲁, 哈木拉提·吐送, 安尼瓦尔·牙生. 术前留置双J管对输尿管软镜手术效果的影响[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(02): 118-121.

Haoxing Wang, Maolakuerban Naibijiang·, Feng Wang, Guanglu Song, Tusong Hamulati·, Yasheng Anniwaer·. Influence of preoperative indwelling double J stent on the success rate and effect of flexible ureteroscopy[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2017, 11(02): 118-121.

目的

探讨术前留置双J管对输尿管软镜碎石术一期手术成功率、手术时间等的影响。

方法

回顾性研究我科自2014年1月至2015年8月因肾结石或输尿管上段结石行经输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术的患者98例。按术前留置双J管3~5 d后行输尿管软镜碎石和术前未留置双J管直接行软镜碎石分为两组。分析比较两组一期手术成功率、手术时间、术后并发症、术后住院时间及住院费用的差别。

结果

术前留置双J管3~5 d再行输尿管软镜碎石组与术前未留置双J管直接行输尿管软镜碎石组相比一期手术成功率分别为98%(49/50)和89.6%(43/48)(P>0.05),差异无统计学意义;手术时间分别为(44±13)min和(54±12)min(P<0.05),差异有统计学意义;住院费用分别为(20 183±3 426)元和(15 655±3 542)元(P<0.05),差异有统计学意义;在术后并发症及术后住院时间方面差异无统计学意义。

结论

术前留置双J管3~5 d再行输尿管软镜碎石组与未留置双J管组的手术成功率相当;术前留置双J管可明显缩短软镜碎石手术时间,效果肯定。

Objective

To investigate the effect of preoperative indwelling double J stent for flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy.

Methods

Ninety-eight patients with renal calculi or ureteral calculi treated by flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in our hospital from January 2014 to August 2015. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether received indwelling double J stent 3-5 days before operation. The difference of successful rate, operation time, postoperative complications, hospitalization time and cost were analyzed.

Result

The operation time of the group received indwelling double J stent 3-5 days was shorter [(44±13) min vs (54±12) min, P<0.05], but got more expensive hospitalization cost [(20 183±3 426) yuan vs (15 655±3 542) yuan, P<0.05]. There were no significant differences in the success rate [98%(49/50) vs 89.6%(43/48), P>0.05], postoperative complications and postoperative hospitalization time between the two groups.

Conclusion

The preoperative indwelling double J stent can significantly shorten the operation time of flexible ureteroscopy, but the effect on flexible ureteroscopy success rate needs further study.

表1 两组患者手术资料的比较
[1]
达骏,徐明曦,王忠.输尿管软镜积极治疗2cm以下肾结石伴复杂尿路感染[J].现代泌尿外科杂志, 2015, 20(2):128-130.
[2]
桂定文,杨嗣星,张青汉.输尿管软镜治疗肾结石的现状和展望[J].临床泌尿外科杂志, 2014, 29(5):452-457.
[3]
Ng H, Somani K, Dennison A, et al. Irrigant flow and intrarenal pressure during flexible ureteroscopy: the effect of different access sheaths, working Channel instruments, and hydrostatic pressure[J]. J Endourol, 2010, 24(12):1915-1920.
[4]
Zhong W, Leto G, Wang L, et al. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome after flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a study of risk factors[J]. J Endourol, 2015, 29(1):25-28.
[5]
Auge BK, Pietrow PK, Lallas CD, et al. Ureteral access sheath provides protection against elevated renal pressures during routine flexible ureteroscopic stone manipulation[J]. J Endourol, 2004, 18(1):33-36.
[6]
陈洪波,杨嗣星,宋超.等逆行肾内手术治疗不同大小肾结石的疗效分析[J/CD].中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志:电子版, 2014, 8(1):12-15.
[7]
Monga M, Bhayani S, Landman J, et al. Ureteral access for upper urinary tract disease: The Access Sheath[J]. J Endourol, 2001, 15(8):831-834.
[8]
杨炜青,李逊,何永忠,等.输尿管软镜碎石术前留置双J管的随机对照研究[J/CD].中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志:电子版, 2016, 10(2):26-29.
[9]
段康,刘齐贵,王跃力,等.双J管预扩张输尿管软镜治疗肾结石363例疗效分析[J].中国微创外科杂志, 2015, 15(8):692-694.
[10]
Miernik AM, Wilhelm K. Combined semirigid and flexible ureterorenoscopy via a large ureteral access sheath for kindey stones> 2cm: a bicentric prospective accessment[J]. World J Urol, 2014, 32(3):697-702.
[11]
Dogan HS, Onal B, Satar N,et a1. Factors affecting complication rates of ureteroscopic lithotripsy in children:results of multi-institutional retrospective analysis by Pediatric Stone Disease Study Group of Turkish Pediatric Urology Society.J Urol,2011,186(3):1035-1040.
[12]
何朝辉,曾国华.输尿管软镜术[J].微创泌尿外科杂志, 2013, 2(2):142-145.
[13]
陈南辉,陈智林,黄志成,等.输尿管软镜下钬激光碎石治疗经皮肾镜取石术后残留结石[J/CD].中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志:电子版, 2013, 7(6):32-34.
[1] 郑鹏, 吴赛萍, 谢秀璋, 史庆丰. 术前预测感染性肾结石列线图模型的构建及验证[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 299-306.
[2] 张文涛, 陈俊明, 秦海生, 杨胜进, 余朝辉, 白冰, 王世洋, 段彩莲, 王震. 4.8 F可视肾镜在飞行人员肾脏小结石中的临床应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 593-596.
[3] 方钟进, 黄华生, 陈早庆, 郁兆存, 郑哲明, 谢永康, 陈仲宁, 邹演辉, 刘乾海, 陈镇宏. 负压组合式输尿管镜联合输尿管软镜与经皮肾镜治疗复杂性肾结石的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 601-604.
[4] 曹智, 朱希望, 王尉, 张辉, 杨成林, 张小明. 经皮肾镜碎石取石术中不同肾盂内压力与围术期并发症相关性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 616-620.
[5] 方道成, 胡媛媛. 钙和维生素D与肾结石形成关系的研究进展[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 653-656.
[6] 张磊, 米洋, 王昌喜, 李曜行, 王小东, 牛旭东, 王靖宇. 一次性输尿管软镜通路鞘两种置入深度的临床研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 486-489,494.
[7] 徐哲, 罗杰, 吴强, 李忠, 王晓伟, 郑硕, 郝晓东, 王照. 腹主动脉钙化患者肾结石成分特点及危险因素分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 481-485.
[8] 周川鹏, 杨浩, 魏微阳, 王奇, 黄亚强. 微创与标准通道经皮肾镜治疗肾结石合并肾功能不全的对比研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 470-475.
[9] 颜廷帅, 全科立, 舒建平, 何高飞. 经皮肾镜碎石取石术中留置双J管制造肾积水的研究进展[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 415-417.
[10] 钟美浓, 张美芬, 黄群雄, 南晓燕, 区淑钧, 林华芬. 医护协同导向微服务在留置双J管患者居家健康指导中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 382-387.
[11] 龚茂迪, 李涛, 陈伟, 徐述雄. 一例长期口服糖皮质激素患者在经皮肾镜碎石取石术后反复发热的管理经验[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 284-287.
[12] 王鑫, 覃智标, 陈思桦, 张家宙, 毕革文, 雷华, 李起广. 术前低剂量CT预定位及术中B超修正定位在经皮肾镜术中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 223-227.
[13] 范翰共, 刘聪, 洪佳辉, 林悦悦, 林斯琪. 负压吸引鞘在微创经皮肾镜碎石取石术中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 140-143.
[14] 金敬苗, 韦巍, 钟羽翔, 麦源, 黄剑华, 赵朋朋, 林富祥, 李旷怡, 徐战平. 侧卧位微创经皮肾镜联合Y形负压吸引鞘治疗中老年铸型结石的研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 144-148.
[15] 张曦才, 曹先德. 经皮肾镜取石术治疗无积水肾结石中皮肾通道建立的应用研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 911-915.
阅读次数
全文


摘要