切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (05) : 356 -359. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2020.05.009

临床研究

输尿管软镜治疗输尿管上段不同CT值结石的临床分析
赵德威1, 倪立董1, 王大亚1, 黄求整1, 刘超1, 洪诗哲1,()   
  1. 1. 325001 浙江,温州市中心医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-30 出版日期:2020-10-10
  • 通信作者: 洪诗哲

Clinical analysis of flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi under different Hounsfield unit(Hu) value

Dewei Zhao1, Lidong Ni1, Daya Wang1, Qiuzheng Huang1, Chao Liu1, Shizhe Hong1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, Wenzhou Central Hospital, Wenzhou 325001, China
  • Received:2019-03-30 Published:2020-10-10
  • Corresponding author: Shizhe Hong
引用本文:

赵德威, 倪立董, 王大亚, 黄求整, 刘超, 洪诗哲. 输尿管软镜治疗输尿管上段不同CT值结石的临床分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(05): 356-359.

Dewei Zhao, Lidong Ni, Daya Wang, Qiuzheng Huang, Chao Liu, Shizhe Hong. Clinical analysis of flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi under different Hounsfield unit(Hu) value[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(05): 356-359.

目的

探讨输尿管软镜处理输尿管上段不同CT值结石的安全性及有效性。

方法

回顾性分析2017年6月至2018年6月在温州市中心医院接受输尿管软镜下钬激光碎石术治疗,且结石<20 mm的患者,根据结石CT值>或<800 Hu将患者分为两组,>800 Hu(高CT值组)91例,(低CT值组)88例,比较两组的手术时间、结石清除率及术后并发症发生率。

结果

低CT值组和高CT值组在年龄、男女比例、结石大小、合并症方面比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。平均手术时长分别为(43±23)min、(50±25)min,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组间术后并发症发生率分别3.3%、6.8%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组清石率分别为94.6%、93.2%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

输尿管软镜处理<20 mm输尿管上段结石时安全、有效;结石CT值>800 Hu可使手术时间延长,碎石效率降低。术前评估患者CT值大小可一定程度上评估术后并发症发生率,以便泌尿外科医师选择术式,把握难度。

Objective

To evaluate the effect of Hounsfield unit(Hu) value to the efficiency of flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) for the upper ureteral calculi.

Methods

The data of patients with upper ureteral calculi who were treated by FURS with holmium laser lithotripsy between June 2017 and June 2018, with calculi size <20 mm, at Wenzhou Central Hospital were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were divided into two groups according to the CT value(above 800 Hu or below 800 Hu), the high CT value group included 91 patients and the Low CT group included 88 patients. Then compared the operative time, stone-free(SF), and the complications status between the two groups.

Results

The age, male-female ratio, the stone size or the accompanying diseases between the low CT group and the high Hu group had no statistical difference (P>0.05).The average operative time of the two groups was (43±23) min and (50±25) min, respectively, which had statistical difference respectively (P<0.05); the incidence of complications was 3.3% and 6.8%, respectively, which had no statistical difference (P<0.05); the SF was 94.6% and 93.2%, respectively, which had no statistical difference (P>0.05).

Conclusions

FURS for the upper ureteral calculi, with calculi size <20 mm, was safe and effective; the Hu of calculi above 800 Hu could extend operative time and reduce lithotripsy efficiency. Preoperative evaluation of Hu value of patients, to a certain extent,could help the urologists to evaluate incidence of postoperative complications and grasp the difficulty and the risk of surgery.

表1 两组输尿管上段结石患者一般资料对比
表2 Logistic回归分析四个别列对179例患者并发症和清石效果的影响
[1]
郑定钦,周青英,林宣良, 等. 经尿道输尿管镜碎石取石术与微创经皮肾镜碎石术治疗输尿管上段嵌顿性结石的效果对比[J].当代医药论丛, 2017, 15(8): 79-80.
[2]
Tailly T, Larish Y, Nadeau B, et al. Combining mean and standard deviation of hounsfield unit measurements from preoperative ct allows more accurate prediction of urinary stone composition than mean hounsfield units alone[J]. J Endourol, 2016, 30(4): 453-459.
[3]
Xun Y, Li J, Geng Y, et al. Single extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for proximal ureter stones: Can CT texture analysis technique help predict the therapeutic effect?[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2018, 107: 84-89.
[4]
Niwa N, Matsumoto K, Miyahara M, et al. Simple and practical nomograms for predicting the stone-free rate after shock wave lithotripsy in patients with a solitary upper ureteral stone[J]. World J Urol, 2017, 35(9): 1455-1461.
[5]
Lee JY, Kim JH, Kang DH, et al. Stone heterogeneity index as the standard deviation of Hounsfield units: A novel predictor for shock-wave lithotripsy outcomes in ureter calculi[J]. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 23988.
[6]
桂定文,杨嗣星,张青汉. 输尿管软镜治疗肾结石的现状和展望[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2014, 29(5): 452-457.
[7]
Hyams ES, Monga M, Pearle MS, et al. A prospective, multi-institutional study of flexible ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral stones smaller than 2 cm[J]. J Urol, 2015, 193(1): 165-169.
[8]
Jiao B, Lai S, Xu X, et al. The efficacy of flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy and miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of renal and proximal ureteral calculi of ≤2 cm: A retrospective study[J].Medicine (Baltimore),2019,98(11):e14535.
[9]
周达学,曲海源. CT值测定在输尿管结石治疗方法选择中的应用[J]. 中国医药导报, 2013, (27):81-83.
[10]
陶水祥,吴钢峰,骆振刚, 等. 结石CT值测定联合输尿管软镜单次治疗大负荷肾结石[J].中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2015, 8(5): 32-34.
[11]
彭毅,卜强,秦锁炳, 等. 结石CT值对输尿管软镜钬激光碎石效率影响的研究[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(5): 302-305.
[12]
Ito H, Kawahara T, Terao H, et al. Predictive value of attenuation coefficients measured as Hounsfield units on noncontrast computed tomography during flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy: a single-center experience[J]. J Endourol, 2012, 26(9): 1125-1130.
[13]
彭毅,卜强. CT值在上尿路结石成分及其治疗效果预测价值中的研究概况[J].中国临床新医学, 2017, 10(6): 588-591.
[14]
Lee SH, Kim TH, Myung SC, et al. Effectiveness of flexible ureteroscopic stone removal for treating ureteral and ipsilateral renal stones: a single-center experience[J]. Korean J Urol, 2013, 54(6): 377-382.
[15]
Senel C, Tuncel A, Balci M, et al. Safety and reliability of fluoroscopy-free technique in retrograde intrarenal surgery[J]. Minerva Urol Nefrol, 2018, 70(6): 606-611.
[16]
Tan ST, Chen X, Sun M, et al. The comparation of effects and security of double-J stent retention and ureteroscopy lithotripsy in the treatment of symptomatic ureteral calculi during pregnancy[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2018, 227: 32-34.
[17]
Kirac M, Ergin G, Kibar Y, et al. The Efficacy of Ureteroscopy Without Fluoroscopy for Ureteral and Renal Stones in Pediatric Patients[J]. J Endourol, 2018, 32(2): 100-105.
[18]
Cindolo L, Castellan P, Scoffone CM, et al. Mortality and flexible ureteroscopy: analysis of six cases[J]. World J Urol, 2016, 34(3): 305-310.
[19]
刘勇刚,孙毅海. 良性输尿管狭窄的临床研究及腔内治疗进展[J].微创医学, 2018, 13(4): 485-487.
[20]
Sheng L, Zhang ZY, Qian WQ, et al. Treatment of ureteral fibroepithelial polyp by ureteroscopy combined with holmium laser or thulium laser: a retrospective study[J]. Photomed Laser Surg, 2016, 34(10): 456-459.
[1] 杜贵伟, 陆勇, 成博, 贺薏, 梁爽. 钬激光碎石术术后联合坦索罗辛治疗对输尿管结石患者的影响分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 491-496.
[2] 莫淇舟, 苏劲, 黄健, 李健维, 李思宁, 柳建军. 智能控压输尿管软镜碎石吸引取石术在直径10~25 mm上尿路结石中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 497-502.
[3] 苏博兴, 肖博, 李建兴. 2024年美国泌尿外科学会年会结石领域手术治疗相关热点研究及解读[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 303-308.
[4] 张斌, 孙代宇, 胡昕, 韩菲, 李久明, 李功雨, 吴伟力, 冯宝富, 彭国辉. 评分系统预测不同经验手术者输尿管软镜术后结石清除率准确性的比较研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 353-360.
[5] 麦子结, 曾学晴, 张乾升, 刘永达. 输尿管软镜术后严重出血治疗的初步探索[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 366-371.
[6] 莫淇舟, 柳建军, 叶木石, 黄兴端, 李健维, 李思宁, 黄健, 苏劲. 二期原通道经皮肾镜联合输尿管软镜治疗经皮肾镜术后残石[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 380-385.
[7] 詹留松, 刘百川, 赵建朋, 薛国详. 可弯曲负压吸引鞘辅助输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 271-276.
[8] 王思成, 贾斌, 樊体武. 输尿管硬镜腔内操作"运镜八法"运用技巧及总结[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 168-171.
[9] 李云智, 蒋晓峰, 金铭, 杨江华, 李海斌, 赵盟杰, 刘冬, 高国静, 孟繁超, 崔功静, 廖晓星. 输尿管软镜碎石术治疗累计直径>2 cm上尿路结石一期清石率影响因素及预测模型建立[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 58-63.
[10] 方钟进, 黄华生, 陈早庆, 郁兆存, 郑哲明, 谢永康, 陈仲宁, 邹演辉, 刘乾海, 陈镇宏. 负压组合式输尿管镜联合输尿管软镜与经皮肾镜治疗复杂性肾结石的比较[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 601-604.
[11] 张磊, 米洋, 王昌喜, 李曜行, 王小东, 牛旭东, 王靖宇. 一次性输尿管软镜通路鞘两种置入深度的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 486-489.
[12] 伍学成, 李远伟, 袁武雄, 王建松, 石泳中, 卢强, 李卓, 陈佳, 刘哲, 滕伊漓, 高智勇. 炎症介质谱联合降钙素原在尿源性脓毒血症中的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 476-480.
[13] 徐慧新, 刘波, 唐立钧. 体外冲击波治疗>1 cm输尿管上段结石失败的预测模型建立[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 506-511.
[14] 杨天池, 韩威, 邱枫, 祁佳慧. 术中胰腺超声弹性成像在胰腺质地评估中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 646-650.
[15] 倪颖, 张铁龙, 王岗, 高玉龙, 陈韶鹏, 倪家璇. 未预置支架逆行输尿管镜治疗近端输尿管结石手术中的困难与应对[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 795-801.
阅读次数
全文


摘要