切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (05) : 428 -430. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2021.05.015

临床研究

输尿管硬镜和软镜钬激光碎石术对输尿管上段结石患者疗效的比较
吉春冬1,(), 王健宇1, 刘凯1, 邵文光2   
  1. 1. 617000 四川,攀枝花市中西医结合医院泌尿外科
    2. 233000 安徽,蚌埠市医学院附属医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-14 出版日期:2021-10-01
  • 通信作者: 吉春冬

Comparison of the effect of rigid and flexible ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy for the patients with upper ureteral calculi

Chundong Ji1,(), Jianyu Wang1, Kai Liu1, Wenguang Shao2   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, Panzhihua Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital, Sichuan 617000, China
    2. Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, AnHui 233000, China
  • Received:2020-07-14 Published:2021-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Chundong Ji
引用本文:

吉春冬, 王健宇, 刘凯, 邵文光. 输尿管硬镜和软镜钬激光碎石术对输尿管上段结石患者疗效的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 428-430.

Chundong Ji, Jianyu Wang, Kai Liu, Wenguang Shao. Comparison of the effect of rigid and flexible ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy for the patients with upper ureteral calculi[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(05): 428-430.

目的

比较分析输尿管硬镜和输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术对输尿管上段结石患者的疗效。

方法

将攀枝花中中西医结合医院2014年2月至2019年2月收治的120例输尿管上段结石患者根据输尿管镜碎石方案分为采取输尿管硬镜碎石治疗组70例及采取输尿管软镜碎石治疗组50例,对两组手术时间、住院费用、一次碎石成功率、肠鸣音恢复时间、排便时间、住院时间、并发症发生率进行对比。

结果

软镜组一次碎石成功率高于对照组,肠鸣音恢复时间、排便时间、住院时间短于对照组,住院费用高于硬镜组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组手术时间、并发症发生率数值相当,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

在输尿管上段结石治疗中输尿管软镜取得的效果总体上优于输尿管硬镜,但所需费用更高,临床可根据患者意愿合理选用。

Objective

To compare effect of ureteroscopic rigid and flexible ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy for the patients with upper ureteral calculi.

Methods

A total of 120 patients with upper ureteral calculi admitted to Panzhihua Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital from February 2014 to February 2019 were divided into two groups. There were 70 patients underwent rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy and 50 treated with flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy. The operation time, hospitalization costs, success rate of primary lithotripsy, bowel sound recovery time, defecation time, hospital stay and incidence f complications were compared between the two groups.

Results

The success rate of primary lithotripsy in the flexible group was higher than that in the rigid group. The recovery time of bowel sounds, defecation time and hospital stay in the rigid group were higher than those in the flexible group. The differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The operation time and the incidence rate of complications in the two groups were similar. The differences were not statistically significant (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Flexible ureteroscopy is superior to rigid ureteroscopy in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi.

表1 两组输尿管上段结石患者一般资料对比
表2 两组输尿管上段结石患者手术时间等计量资料的比较(±s
表3 两组输尿管上段结石患者一次碎石成功率、并发症发生率对比(例)
[1]
徐凯琪, 蔡波, 邢钱伟, 等. 输尿管软硬一体镜治疗上尿路结石90例单中心经验[J]. 南通大学学报(医学版), 2017, 37(6): 508-511.
[2]
周鹏, 顾月颖, 赵文超, 等. 体外冲击波碎石术和输尿管软镜治疗输尿管上段结石疗效比较[J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志, 2018, 7(5): 310-313.
[3]
矫宾宾, 张萌, 赖世聪, 等. 输尿管软镜碎石术治疗肾或输尿管上段结石51例临床分析[J]. 中日友好医院学报, 2018, 32(3): 148-151.
[4]
胡豪, 陈欣, 蒋立, 等. 一期输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术治疗≤2 cm单侧上尿路结石的临床研究[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2018, 40(12): 1148-1154.
[5]
王翔, 黎承杨, 汪小明, 等. 电子输尿管软镜与纤维输尿管软镜治疗上尿路结石的疗效对比研究[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2018, 33(2): 93-95+100.
[6]
邢刚, 邓国卫, 廖国亮, 等. 组合式输尿管硬镜联合软镜与经皮肾镜治疗肾盂结石的比较[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(1): 24-27.
[7]
何晓亮, 顾鹏, 章民昊, 等. 输尿管软镜同期治疗双侧上尿路结石的疗效分析[J/CD].中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(5): 319-321.
[8]
Jiang JT, Li WG, Zhu YP, et al. Comparison of the clinical efficacy and safety of retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy and ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy in the treatment of obstructive upper ureteral calculi with concurrent urinary tract infections[J]. Lasers Med Sci, 2016, 31(5): 915-20.
[9]
顾志文, 郑彬, 罗发彩, 等. 输尿管硬镜与软镜治疗10~20 mm输尿管上段结石的比较[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2018, 18(9): 814-818.
[1] 汪帮琦, 陈波特, 林浩坚, 许晖阳, 王镇伟, 袁雪峰, 林康健, 邱晓拂. 经腹入路3D腹腔镜联合输尿管硬镜同期处理肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻并肾盏结石的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 597-600.
[2] 方钟进, 黄华生, 陈早庆, 郁兆存, 郑哲明, 谢永康, 陈仲宁, 邹演辉, 刘乾海, 陈镇宏. 负压组合式输尿管镜联合输尿管软镜与经皮肾镜治疗复杂性肾结石的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 601-604.
[3] 伍学成, 李远伟, 袁武雄, 王建松, 石泳中, 卢强, 李卓, 陈佳, 刘哲, 滕伊漓, 高智勇. 炎症介质谱联合降钙素原在尿源性脓毒血症中的诊断价值[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 476-480.
[4] 张磊, 米洋, 王昌喜, 李曜行, 王小东, 牛旭东, 王靖宇. 一次性输尿管软镜通路鞘两种置入深度的临床研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 486-489,494.
[5] 徐慧新, 刘波, 唐立钧. 体外冲击波治疗>1 cm输尿管上段结石失败的预测模型建立[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 506-511.
[6] 胡金科, 钟文. 妊娠期输尿管结石的处理与转归[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 377-381.
[7] 汪帮琦, 张小明, 肖远松, 聂海波, 吕军, 王尉. 电切镜与输尿管镜在输尿管中下段结石并输尿管开口进镜困难中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 157-159.
[8] 李晓山, 刘巍, 魏世平. 双J管-Folys导尿管捆绑复合体在输尿管镜钬激光碎石术中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 154-156.
[9] 黄日欢, 曹浪泉, 刘思云. 经皮肾镜联合负压吸引鞘在治疗肾和输尿管上段结石中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 54-57.
[10] 宋生生, 顾志文, 谭日钊, 谭礼林, 贾晨尧, 郑彬. 经皮肾镜与输尿管软镜治疗肾下盏小鹿角形结石的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 534-538.
[11] 林枫, 陶水祥, 王钢, 徐家栋, 林奕伟, 郑祥义. 一期软性输尿管镜治疗上尿路结石的置鞘成功率及疗效分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 432-436.
[12] 艾合买提·艾买尔, 阿不力孜·司马义, 雷鹏, 塔来提·塔依尔, 张小安, 亚力坤·阿里木, 文彬, 唐矛. 输尿管软镜下钬激光内切开治疗肾盂旁囊肿的临床分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 339-342.
[13] 何海填, 罗锦斌, 曹石金, 曾灿, 汪洋, 王可兵, 狄金明, 高新. 6/7.5 F输尿管镜联合输尿管导管负压吸引治疗输尿管上段结石216例报告[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 248-251.
[14] 崔亮, 付春龙, 代晓飞, 张讯, 靖万林, 孙晓俊, 李景敏. 输尿管软镜处理大于3 cm肾结石的有效性和安全性评价[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(04): 222-226.
[15] 杨冰, 潘东亮, 晋连超, 周哲, 高鹏飞, 周赜, 张志宏, 李宁忱. 体外冲击波碎石对高密度输尿管结石治疗效果的影响因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 308-311.
阅读次数
全文


摘要