切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (06) : 497 -501. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2021.06.011

临床研究

安全导丝在输尿管镜碎石治疗中防止结石漂移的临床研究
刘伟1, 潘铁军2, 彭瑛3,(), 杨家荣1, 田洪哲1, 马明1   
  1. 1. 430070 武汉,中部战区总医院泌尿外科
    2. 510515 广州,南方医科大学第一临床学院泌尿外科
    3. 510310 广州,陆军第74集团军医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-11 出版日期:2021-12-01
  • 通信作者: 彭瑛
  • 基金资助:
    863子课题(2012AA021102)

Clinical study of prevention of stone migration by guide wire during ureteroscopic lithotripsy

Wei Liu1, Tiejun Pan2, Ying Peng3,(), Jiarong Yang1, Hongzhe Tian1, Ming Ma1   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, Central War Zone General Hospital, Wuhan 430070, China
    2. Department of Urology, the First Clinical School of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
    3. Department of Urology, Army 74 Army Group Hospital, Guangzhou 510310, China
  • Received:2021-03-11 Published:2021-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Ying Peng
引用本文:

刘伟, 潘铁军, 彭瑛, 杨家荣, 田洪哲, 马明. 安全导丝在输尿管镜碎石治疗中防止结石漂移的临床研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(06): 497-501.

Wei Liu, Tiejun Pan, Ying Peng, Jiarong Yang, Hongzhe Tian, Ming Ma. Clinical study of prevention of stone migration by guide wire during ureteroscopic lithotripsy[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(06): 497-501.

目的

评估安全导丝(双J管自带内置导丝)在输尿管镜治疗输尿管中下段结石中防止结石漂移的临床作用。

方法

回顾2016年1月至2020年5月,中部战区总医院收治的输尿管中、下段结石行输尿管镜钬激光治疗的患者,共125例,其中有69例碎石术中留置安全导丝(安全导丝组);其余56例碎石过程中未使用任何辅助碎石装置(非安全导丝组)。对两组患者的手术时间、结石清除率、术后并发症、住院费用等进行综合分析对比。

结果

全部125例患者术后均未出现输尿管损伤及严重感染等并发症,安全导丝组的患者碎石成功率达100%,非安全导丝组的患者有4例结石漂移至肾盂,成功率93%,差异有明显统计学意义(P<0.05);非安全导丝组患者平均手术时间为(26.3±14.7)min,安全导丝组(25.2±12.8)min,差异无明显统计学意义(P>0.05)。非安全导丝组手术费用为(11 856±1 547)元,安全导丝组为(12 126±1 013)元,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

输尿管镜钬激光碎石治疗输尿管中下段结石术中应用安全导丝可有效防止输尿管结石漂移,同时有结石清除率高,安全性好,术后并发症少,不增加额外费用等特点。

Objective

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of guide wire (with built-in wire in double J tube) in preventing the migration of stones during ureteroscopic treatment of the middle and lower ureteral stones.

Methods

Clinical data of 125 patients with the middle and lower ureteral stones receiving ureteroscopic holmium laser treatment in Central War Zone General Hospital from January 2016 to May 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, guide wires were retained during lithotripsy in 69 cases (guide wire group), and no auxiliary lithotripsy device was employed in the remaining 56 patients (no guide wire group). The operation time, stone removal rate, postoperative complications and hospitalization expenses were statistically compared between the two groups.

Results

No postoperative complications, such as ureteral injury and severe infection occurred. The success rate of lithotripsy was 100% in the guide wire group, significantly higher than that in the no guide wire group 93% (P<0.05). The average operation time in the no guide wire group was (26.3±14.7) min, which did not significantly less than the guide wire group (25.2±12.8) min (P>0.05). There was no difference in operation cost between the two group.

Conclusion

Application of guide wire can effectively prevent the migration of ureteral stones during ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy for the middle and lower ureteral stones. Moreover, it has the advantages of high stone removal rate, high safety, few postoperative complications and no additional expenses.

表1 两组输尿管中下段结石患者术前各项指标比较
表2 两组输尿管中下段结石患者术后各项指标比较
图4 8~9.8 F输尿管镜内可同时容纳4根导丝
[4]
Torricelli FCM, Monga M, Marchini GS, et al. Semi-rigid ureteroscopic 1ithotripsy versus laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for large upper ureteral stones: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Int Braz J Urol, 2016, 42(4): 645-654.
[5]
金鑫, 周鹏, 赵文超, 等. 输尿管镜联合封堵取石导管与输尿管软镜治疗输尿管上段结石的疗效比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 25(3): 188-189.
[6]
Wang Y, Zhong B, Yang X, et al.Comparison of the efficacy and safety of URSL, RPLU, and MPCNL for treatment of large upper impact edureteral stones:a randomized controlled trial[J]. BMC Urol, 2017, 17(1): 50.
[7]
苏开德, 周建辉, 刘潜, 等. 经输尿管镜钬激光治疗输尿管结石的临床分析(附350例报告)[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2012, 16(2): 140-142.
[8]
张英晨, 程玉峰, 丁吉阳, 等. 内置3F输尿管导管在输尿管镜钬激光碎石术中的临床应用[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2018, 33(3), 229-234.
[9]
Chiang BJ, Liao CH, Lin YH. The efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for symptomatic ureteral stones: predictors of treatment failure without the assistance of computed tomography[J].PLo SOne, 2017, 12(9): e0184855.
[10]
Tadeusz K, Daniela G, Robert S,etal. Dual usage of a stone basket: stone capture and retropulsion prevention[J]. Can Urol Assoc J, 2018, 12(8): 280-283.
[11]
辛玉宏, 赵国平, 张彩虹, 等. 输尿管封堵取石导管在输尿管上段结石中的应用 [J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(6): 380-383。
[12]
李丽, 徐勇, 齐士勇, 等. 输尿管镜结石术后防止结石移位策略的研究进展[J]. 天津医药, 2015, 43(7): 822-825.
[13]
马潞林. 泌尿外科微创手术学[M]. 人民卫生出版社, 2013: 341-342.
[14]
刘定益, 俞家顺, 王健, 等. 输尿管镜钬激光治疗输尿管结石1015例疗效分析[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2015, 15(8): 695-698.
[15]
高飞, 罗林. 输尿管镜秋激光碎石术治疗输尿管结石术后发热的危险因素分析[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(2): 91-94.
[16]
Uchiday, TakazawaR,Kitayamas, et al. Predictive risk factors for systemic inflammatory response syndrome following ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy. [J].Urolithiasis, 2017, 46(4): 375-381.
[1]
黄健. 主编. 中国泌尿外科和男科疾病诊断治疗指南手册(2019版)[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2020: 248-249.
[2]
Valentin Z, Patrick B, Dominik A, et al.Surgical management of urolithiasis-a systematic analysis of available guidelines[J].BMC Urol, 2018, 18(1): 25.
[3]
Bhat A, Singh V, Bhat M, et al. Comparison of antegrade percutaneous versus retrograde ureteroscopic lithotripsy for upper ur e teric calculus for stone clearance,morbidity,and complications[J]. Indian J Urol, 2019, 35(1): 48-53.
[1] 方钟进, 黄华生, 陈早庆, 郁兆存, 郑哲明, 谢永康, 陈仲宁, 邹演辉, 刘乾海, 陈镇宏. 负压组合式输尿管镜联合输尿管软镜与经皮肾镜治疗复杂性肾结石的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 601-604.
[2] 徐慧新, 刘波, 唐立钧. 体外冲击波治疗>1 cm输尿管上段结石失败的预测模型建立[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 506-511.
[3] 伍学成, 李远伟, 袁武雄, 王建松, 石泳中, 卢强, 李卓, 陈佳, 刘哲, 滕伊漓, 高智勇. 炎症介质谱联合降钙素原在尿源性脓毒血症中的诊断价值[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 476-480.
[4] 胡金科, 钟文. 妊娠期输尿管结石的处理与转归[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 377-381.
[5] 吴骏超, 和术臣, 王海峰, 王家平, 邱学德. 输尿管软镜与经皮肾镜治疗有经皮肾镜手术史的复杂性结石的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 233-236.
[6] 汪帮琦, 张小明, 肖远松, 聂海波, 吕军, 王尉. 电切镜与输尿管镜在输尿管中下段结石并输尿管开口进镜困难中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 157-159.
[7] 李晓山, 刘巍, 魏世平. 双J管-Folys导尿管捆绑复合体在输尿管镜钬激光碎石术中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 154-156.
[8] 黄日欢, 曹浪泉, 刘思云. 经皮肾镜联合负压吸引鞘在治疗肾和输尿管上段结石中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 54-57.
[9] 马涛, 叶春伟, 李志鹏. 输尿管镜碎石术后留置输尿管支架的必要性探讨[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 463-467.
[10] 邓超华, 李炯明, 刘建和, 方克伟, 王光, 李沛, 段飞. 经皮肾镜联合输尿管镜治疗双J管长期滞留并发结石[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 335-338.
[11] 胡庆庆, 王建忠, 樊松, 赵磊, 徐汉江, 刘明, 詹长生, 郝宗耀, 傅强, 梁朝朝. 无线智能腔镜系统在泌尿系结石输尿管镜治疗中的初步应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 298-301.
[12] 庄宝琳, 郑万祥, 庄宝钧, 杨力军, 王福利, 袁建林, 秦卫军, 武国军, 刘飞. 数字化肾脏及其衍生应用在肾结石内镜手术中的研究进展[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 285-288.
[13] 何海填, 罗锦斌, 曹石金, 曾灿, 汪洋, 王可兵, 狄金明, 高新. 6/7.5 F输尿管镜联合输尿管导管负压吸引治疗输尿管上段结石216例报告[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 248-251.
[14] 杨冰, 潘东亮, 晋连超, 周哲, 高鹏飞, 周赜, 张志宏, 李宁忱. 体外冲击波碎石对高密度输尿管结石治疗效果的影响因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 308-311.
[15] 杨冰, 潘东亮, 晋连超, 周哲, 高鹏飞, 周赜, 张志宏, 李宁忱. 输尿管肾盂镜钬激光碎石术后尿脓毒症相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(02): 107-111.
阅读次数
全文


摘要