切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (03) : 198 -203. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2022.03.002

临床研究

腹腔镜膀胱癌根治术尿道改流留置外、内支架管与无管化的对比研究
肖东明1, 刘硕儒1, 张斌1, 李茂胤1, 黄文涛1, 张浩1, 胡成1,()   
  1. 1. 510630 广州,中山大学附属第三医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-09 出版日期:2022-06-01
  • 通信作者: 胡成

A comparative study of indwelling external, internal stents and tubeless for ureteroenteric anastomosis of laparoscopic radical cystectomy with urinary diversion

Dongming Xiao1, Shuoru Liu1, Bin Zhang1, Maoyin Li1, Wentao Huang1, Hao Zhang1, Cheng Hu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, the Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
  • Received:2021-12-09 Published:2022-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Cheng Hu
引用本文:

肖东明, 刘硕儒, 张斌, 李茂胤, 黄文涛, 张浩, 胡成. 腹腔镜膀胱癌根治术尿道改流留置外、内支架管与无管化的对比研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 198-203.

Dongming Xiao, Shuoru Liu, Bin Zhang, Maoyin Li, Wentao Huang, Hao Zhang, Cheng Hu. A comparative study of indwelling external, internal stents and tubeless for ureteroenteric anastomosis of laparoscopic radical cystectomy with urinary diversion[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(03): 198-203.

目的

比较腹腔镜膀胱癌根治术尿道改流(RCUD)中留置外、内支架管与无管化术后的效果。

方法

回顾性分析100例于2015年1月至2021年1月在中山大学附属第三医院泌尿外科行RCUD膀胱癌患者的资料。根据术中的处理方法不同分为外支架管组(48例)、内支架管组(9例)和无管组(43例)。统计学分析三组患者的基本资料、围手术期指标以及术后并发症等情况。

结果

RCUD术后尿漏总发生率为15%,外支架组明显低于无管组(6.3% vs 25.6%,P=0.031),内支架管组的发生率为11.1%;尿培养阳性率为29%,外支架管组明显低于无管组(18.8% vs 41.9%,P=0.047),内支架管组的发生率为22.2%;三组患者间内支架管组手术时间更短[(365±88)min vs (469± 120)min vs (457±98)min,P=0.034];内支架管组术后住院时间更短[(9.0±2.3)d vs (20.6±12.6)d vs(21.3±11.1)d,P=0.013]。患者RCUD术后肠梗阻发生率(P=0.097)、伤口愈合不良发生率(P= 0.113)、输尿管肠吻合口狭窄(UEAS) (P=0.978)、术后30 d再入院率(P=0.919)和总并发症评分(P=0.801)组间差异无统计学意义。

结论

膀胱癌根治术中使用内支架管安全可靠,可明显缩短手术时间和术后住院时间。与无管化相比,放置外支架管可明显降低术后尿漏的发生率和术后尿路感染风险。

Objective

To compare the postoperative effects of indwelling external, internal stents and tubeless for uretero-enteric anastomosis of laparoscopic radical cystectomy with urinary diversion (RCUD).

Methods

The data of 100 patients with bladder cancer underwent laparoscopic radical cystectomy with urinary diversion in the Department of Urology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from January 2015 to January 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. According to different intraoperative treatment methods, they were divided into external stent group (48 cases), internal stent group (9 cases) and tubeless group (43 cases), of which the basic data, perioperative indicators and postoperative complications were compared and analyzed.

Results

The total incidence of urine leakage after RCUD was 15%, which was significantly lower in the external stent group than in the tubeless group (6.3% vs 25.6%, P=0.031), while the internal stent group was 11.1%. The positive rate of urine culture was 29 %, only was the external stent group significantly lower than the tubeless group (18.8% vs 41.9%, P=0.047), while the internal stent group was 22.2%. The operation time and the postoperative hospital stay of the internal stent group was shorter than other two groups [(365±88) min vs (469±120) min vs (457±98) min, P=0.034; (9.0±2.3) d vs (20.6±12.6) d vs (21.3±11.1) d, P=0.013]. There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative intestinal obstruction (P=0.097), poor wound healing (P=0.113), ureteroenteric anastomosis stricture (UEAS) (P=0.978), and the rate of readmission 30 days after surgery (P=0.919) and total complication score (P=0.801) among the three groups.

Conclusion

Indwelling the internal stent in RCUD is safe and reliable, and it can significantly shorten the operation time and postoperative hospital stay. For tubeless, indwelling the external stent can significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative urine leakage and the risk of postoperative urinary tract infection.

表1 三组腹腔镜膀胱癌尿流改道患者基本资料的比较
表2 三组腹腔镜膀胱癌尿流改道患者围手术期指标和术后并发症情况比较
[1]
Li K, Lin T, Chinese Bladder Cancer C, et al. Current status of diagnosis and treatment of bladder cancer in china - analyses of chinese bladder cancer consortium database[J]. Asian J Urol, 2015, 2(2): 63-69.
[2]
Jarowenko MV, Bennett AH. Use of single J urinary diversion stents in intestinal urinary diversion[J]. Urology198322(4):369-370.
[3]
Smith AD. The universal ureteral stent[J]. J Urol, 1982, 127(5):892-893.
[4]
McMullin N, Khor T, King P. Internal ureteric stenting following pyeloplasty reduces length of hospital stay in children[J]. Br J Urol, 1993, 72(3): 370-372.
[5]
Osman Y, Harraz AM, Barakat TS, et al. External stent versus double J drainage in patients with radical cystectomy and orthotopic urinary diversion: A randomized controlled trial[J]. Int J Urol, 2016, 23(10): 861-865.
[6]
Micali S, De Carli P, Miano R, et al. Double-J ureteral stents: an alternative to external urinary stents in orthotopic bladder substitution[J]. Eur Urol, 2001, 39(5): 575-579.
[7]
Varkarakis IM, Delis A, Papatsoris A, et al. Use of external ureteral catheters and internal double J stents in a modified ileal neobladder for continent diversion: a comparative analysis[J]. Urol Int, 2005, 75(2): 139-143.
[8]
Abdel Hakim MA, Abdalla AA, Saad IR, et al. Internal versus external ureteric stents for uretero-ileal anastomosis after laparoscopic radical cystectomy with orthotopic neobladder: A prospective comparative study[J]. Arab J Urol, 2016, 14(2):136-142.
[9]
Echo H, Zerbib M, Saighi D, et al. Use of double J ureteral stent as an alternative to prevent ureteroileal anastomosis stricture in orthotopic bladder substitution[J]. Prog Urol, 2009, 19(2): 127-131.
[10]
Regan JB, Barrett DM. Stented versus nonstented ureteroileal anastomoses: is there a difference with regard to leak and stricture?[J]. J Urol, 1985, 134(6): 1101-1103.
[11]
Mattei A, Birkhaeuser FD, Baermann C, et al. To stent or not to stent perioperatively the ureteroileal anastomosis of ileal orthotopic bladder substitutes and ileal conduits? Results of a prospective randomized trial[J]. J Urol, 2008,179(2): 582-586.
[12]
Mullins JK, Guzzo TJ, Ball MW, et al. Ureteral stents placed at the time of urinary diversion decreases postoperative morbidity[J]. Urol Int, 2012, 88(1): 66-70.
[13]
Kolwijck E, Seegers A, Tops S, et al. Incidence and microbiology of post-operative infections after radical cystectomy and ureteral stent removal; a retrospective cohort study[J]. BMC Infec Dis, 2019, 19(1): 1-8.
[14]
Werntz RP, Martinez-Acevedo A, Amadi H, et al. Prophylactic antibiotics following radical cystectomy reduces urinary tract infections and readmission for sepsis from a urinary source[J]. Urol Oncol, 2018, 36(5): 238.
[15]
Clifford TG, Katebian B, Van Horn CM, et al. Urinary tract infections following radical cystectomy and urinary diversion: a review of 1133 patients[J]. World J Urol, 2018, 36(5): 775-781.
[16]
刘应清,陶凌松,陈弋生. 无管化经皮肾镜碎石取石术临床应用进展[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(3): 57-60.
[17]
Donat S, Tan K, Jibara G, et al. Intraoperative ureteral stent use at radical cystectomy is associated with higher 30-day complication rates[J]. J Urol, 2021, 205(2): 483-490.
[18]
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey[J]. Ann Surg, 2004, 240(2): 205-213.
[19]
Pycha A, Comploj E, Martini T, et al. Comparison of complications in three incontinent urinary diversions[J]. Eur Urol2008, 54(4): 825-834.
[20]
Ziouziou I, Irani J, Wei J, et al. Ileal conduit vs orthotopic neobladder: which one offers the best health-related quality of life in patients undergoing radical cystectomy? A systematic review of literature and meta-analysis[J]. Prog Urol, 2018, 28(5): 241-250.
[21]
Hautmann RE, de Petriconi RC, Volkmer BG. Lessons learned from 1,000 neobladders: the 90-day complication rate[J]. J Urol2010184(3): 990-994.
[22]
Shabsigh A, Korets R, Vora KC, et al. Defining early morbidity of radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer using a standardized reporting methodology[J]. Eur Urol200955(1): 164-176.
[23]
Krupski T, Theodorescu D. Orthotopic neobladder following cystectomy: indications, management, and outcomes[J]. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs200128(1): 37-46.
[24]
Wickham J, Miller R, Kellett M, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: one stage or two?[J] Br J Urol, 1984, 56(6): 582-585.
[25]
Studer U, Burkhard F, Schumacher M, et al. Twenty years experience with an ileal orthotopic low pressure bladder substitute lessons to be learned[J]. J Urol, 2006, 176(1): 161-166.
[26]
Touiti D, Gelet A, Deligne E, et al. Treatment of uretero-intestinal and ureterovesical strictures by Acucise balloon catheter[J]. Eur Urol, 2002, 42(1): 49-54.
[27]
Tal R, Sivan B, Kedar D, et al. Management of benign ureteral strictures following radical cystectomy and urinary diversion for bladder cancer[J]. J Urol, 2007, 178(2): 538-542.
[1] 张玉, 薛文瑞, 王鑫, 李旭瑜, 王旭东, 袁鹏飞, 梁雨润, 韩志兴, 张海建, 刘庆军, 纪世琪. 人类免疫缺陷病毒感染合并膀胱癌14例临床特点[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 354-358.
[2] 顾志波, 郝林, 陆明, 陈建刚. 光动力纳米载体联合si-P3H4治疗膀胱癌的初步探索[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 633-641.
[3] 熊风, 林辉煌, 陈晓波. 铥激光在泌尿外科中的临床应用及研究进展[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 533-536.
[4] 张星宇, 李炯明, 刘建和, 方克伟, 王光, 杨博伟. 无管化PCNL适应证选择及疗效观察[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 512-515.
[5] 张翼飞, 郭强, 赖华健, 钟文文, 叶雷, 马波, 瞿虎, 尧冰, 邱剑光, 王德娟. 加速康复外科在儿童尿道下裂围术期的应用效果分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 367-371.
[6] 邰胜, 周骏, 施浩强, 杨诚, 尹水平, 牛迪, 郝宗耀, 傅强, 梁朝朝. 无线智能腔镜在腹腔镜膀胱癌根治术中的运用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 22-25.
[7] 彭龙飞, 汪鑫, 夏典, 颜松柏, 王进有, 毕良宽. 腹腔镜下腹膜外膀胱根治和原位新膀胱术的初步体会[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 7-10.
[8] 邓超华, 李炯明, 刘建和, 方克伟, 王光, 李沛, 段飞. 经皮肾镜联合输尿管镜治疗双J管长期滞留并发结石[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 335-338.
[9] 赵永录, 张兴盛, 宋广智, 黄斌, 张斌, 顾鹏守, 刘国淦. 经尿道二次电切在pT1期非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的预后价值研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 316-319.
[10] 钟文, 曾国华. 2021年经皮肾镜欧洲泌尿外科学会尿石症分会与国际尿石症联盟联合专家共识解读[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 193-197.
[11] 赵小峰, 刘明, 蒋元文, 陆敬义, 苏斌杰, 陈枭. 局麻下部分无管化微创经皮肾镜的临床疗效[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 235-238.
[12] 刘天琦, 张振辉, 刘豪圣, 方建雄, 赵超, 刘久敏, 蒲小勇. 腹腔镜下膀胱癌根治术中完全腹膜外经皮输尿管造口术[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(02): 169-172.
[13] 翁铭芳, 刘容, 魏俊杰, 林琴, 孙星慧, 王栋, 吴卫真. 补骨脂素抑制膀胱癌T24细胞增殖和迁移的作用及机制研究[J]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(04): 193-199.
[14] 邓凌钢, 孙建明, 陈晓峰. FBXO6介导的ERO1L泛素化降解对膀胱癌细胞增殖、迁移和侵袭的作用研究[J]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(03): 153-160.
[15] 邓世栋, 刘凌志, 郭大勇, 王超, 黄忠欣, 张晖辉. 沉默SNHG1基因对膀胱癌细胞增殖、凋亡、迁移和铁死亡的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 804-811.
阅读次数
全文


摘要