Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (01): 38-42. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2021.01.010

Special Issue:

• Clinical Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

A comparative study of transurethral enucleation and resection of prostate with bipolar plasma rod electrode in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia

Guolong Liao1, Ying Liu2, Jiani Tang1, Jun Pang1, Donggen Jiang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, the Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen 518107, China
    2. Department of Surgery Anesthesia Center, the Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen 518107, China
  • Received:2020-04-20 Online:2021-02-01 Published:2021-02-01
  • Contact: Donggen Jiang

Abstract:

Objective

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of transurethral enucleation and resection of prostate with bipolar plasma rod electrode(TUERP-BPRE) in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

Methods

The clinical data of 157 BPH cases treated by operation from May 2018 to December 2019 were analyzed retrospectively, including 92 cases in TUERP-BPRE group and 65 cases in TURP Group. The perioperative data and follow-up results in the 3-month postoperation were compared between the two groups.

Results

There was no significant difference in preoperative baseline characteristics between the two groups. The operation time [(60.1±19.6) min vs (67.7±9.1) min], decrease of hemoglobin [(6.1±2.8) g/L vs (7.7±1.5) g/L], bladder irrigation time [(8.1±1.6) h vs (9.1±2.0) h], catheterization time [(4.5±0.7) d vs (4.9±0.8) d] and the duration of hospitalization [(5.3±0.8) d vs (5.7±0.8) d] were significantly lower in TUERP-BPRE group than that in TURP group. The IPSS, QOL, RUV and Qmax of the two groups in the 3-month postoperation were significantly improved than preoperation, while there was no significant difference between the two groups. Moreover, in TUERP-BPRE group, the incidences of electrolyte disturbance (6.5% vs 21.53%) , delayed hematuria (6.5% vs 23.1%) , temporary urinary incontinence (5.4% vs 18.5%) and retrograde ejaculation (2.2% vs 15.4%) were significantly lower than that in TURP group.

Conclusions

The efficacy of TUERP-BPRE and TURP were similar, while the former technique provides shorter operation time, less blood loss, quicker postoperative recovery and fewer complications, which is worthy of clinical application.

Key words: Benign prostatic hyperplasia, Plasma rod electrode, Transurethral enucleation of prostate, Transurethral resection of the prostate

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-85252990 E-mail: chinendourology@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd