Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (01): 16-20. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2020.01.005

Special Issue:

• Clinical Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

The influence of posterior reconstruction technique on continence during prostatectomy: a Meta-analysis

Hetiyaazati Bai1, Sufuaibibuli Yu1, Wenguang Wang1, Yujie Wang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of urology, the first Afflicated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830054, china
  • Received:2018-03-17 Online:2020-02-01 Published:2020-02-01
  • Contact: Yujie Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang yujie, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To evaluate the influence of posterior musculofascial plate reconstruction on early return of continence after radical prostatectomy.

Methods

A systematic research of the electronic databases including Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Scince, CNKI and Wanfang database (from the data of their establishments to January 2018) was given about studies which had compared early return of continence between posterior musculofascial plate reconstruction prostatectomy and conventional prostatectomy. A Meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.3 software.

Results

A total of 22 clinical studies were enrolled, including 3 randomised controlled trials, 5 prospective studies and 14 retrospective studies. A total of 3 594 patients, of whom 2 021 were reconstruction group and the other 1 573 were standard group. Reconstruction group is beneficial than standard group in 3-7 d, 30 d, 90 d, 180 d continence (OR=3.14, 3.15, 3.01, 2.5; P<0.05) and escaping urinary leakage (OR=0.39, P<0.05) after radical prostatectomy. There was no difference in 24 h continence, positive surgical margins, urinary retention, erectile function and bladder neck stricture (OR=1.66, 1.03, 1.38, 0.50, 1.45; P>0.05).

Conclusions

Reconstruction technique is benificial for urinary continence and escaping urinary leakage than standard prostotactomy, and has the same safty on positive surgical margins, urinary retention, erectile function and bladderneck stricture compared with standard prostatectomy.

Key words: Prostate cancer, Urethral reconstruction, Urinary continence, Meta-analysis

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-85252990 E-mail: chinendourology@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd