Abstract:
Objective To explore the clinical value of intravesical prostatic protrusion (IPP) in primary hospitals.
Methods A total of 105 patients of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) underwent transurethral resection prostate (TURP) in Longchuan County Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from Mar. 2016 to Mar. 2019. The patients were classified into group IPP<5 mm and group IPP≥5 mm, the differences of the maximal urinary flow (Qmax) and residual urine volume (RUV) and index of international prostate symptom score (IPSS) in two groups were analyzed comparatively.
Results The average Qmax of patients in IPP≥5 mm group was lower than that in IPP<5 mm group, the difference was statistically significant. The average IPSS and average RUV of patients in IPP≥5 mm group were higher than those in IPP <5 mm group, the difference were statistically significant. There was no significant difference in IPSS, RUV and Qmax between the two groups at 3 months after operation. However, in the group of IPP≥5 mm, the Qmax increased, the residual urine volume decreased, and the IPSS score decreased more significantly, the difference were statistically significant.
Concusion The clinical symptoms and RUV of BPH were positively correlated with the length of IPP, while the Qmax was negatively correlated with the length of IPP. The curative effect of BPH patients with IPP≥5 mm was more significant. IPP is simple and cheap, and the patient has a high degree of acceptance which is suitable for promotion in primary hospitals.
Key words:
Benign prostatic hyperplasia,
Intravesical protrusion of prostate,
Bladder outlet obstructiona,
Prostate resection
Jun Zhang, Chunyan Wei, Wanpeng Huang, Ruodan Liu. The clinical value of intravesical prostatic protrusion in transurethral resection prostate in primary hospitals[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(05): 360-363.