切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (01) : 24 -27. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2018.01.007

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

组合式输尿管硬镜联合软镜与经皮肾镜治疗肾盂结石的比较
邢刚1,(), 邓国卫1, 廖国亮1, 覃怀成1   
  1. 1. 527300 广东,云浮市中医院外二科
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-30 出版日期:2018-02-01
  • 通信作者: 邢刚

Comparison of modular rigid combined flexible ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal pelvis stones

Gang Xing1,(), Guowei Deng1, Guoliang Liao1, Huaicheng Qin1   

  1. 1. Department of the Second Surgery, Yunfu Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangdong 527300, China
  • Received:2017-03-30 Published:2018-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Gang Xing
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xing Gang, Email:
引用本文:

邢刚, 邓国卫, 廖国亮, 覃怀成. 组合式输尿管硬镜联合软镜与经皮肾镜治疗肾盂结石的比较[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(01): 24-27.

Gang Xing, Guowei Deng, Guoliang Liao, Huaicheng Qin. Comparison of modular rigid combined flexible ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal pelvis stones[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(01): 24-27.

目的

探讨组合式输尿管硬镜联合软镜在治疗2~3 cm肾盂结石中的临床应用价值。

方法

回顾性分析云浮市中医院2014年4月至2016年4月收治的87例2~3 cm肾盂结石患者的临床资料,分为组合式输尿管硬镜联合软镜组(40例)和经皮肾镜组(47例),对两组手术时间、结石清除率、平均住院时间及并发症发生率进行观察对比。

结果

纳入研究的两组患者术前一般资料比较差别无统计学意义。组合式输尿管硬镜联合软镜组和经皮肾镜组在结石清除率方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);但组合式输尿管硬镜联合软镜组在手术时间,平均住院时间明显优于经皮肾镜组(P<0.05);而且组合式输尿管硬镜联合软镜组术中出血量及术后发热率少于经皮肾镜组(P<0.05)。

结论

组合式输尿管硬镜结合软镜治疗2~3 cm肾盂结石是安全有效的,具有手术时间短、创伤小,康复快,严重并发症少等优点,值得临床上推广和应用。

Objective

To compare the clinical effects of modular rigid combined flexible ureteroscopy and percntaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for 2-3 cm renal pelvis stones.

Methods

From April 2014 to April 2016, 87 patients with renal pelvis stones (sized 2-3 cm) underwent either modular rigid combined flexible ureteroscopy (n=40) or PCNL (n=47) were accessed. The operative time, postoperative hospital stay time, stone-free rate and complications were analyzed and compared between the two groups.

Results

There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in preoperative general data. In terms of stone-free rate, there was no significant difference between modular rigid combined flexible ureteroscope group and PCNL group (P>0.05). However, the operative time and the postoperative hospital stay time in the modular rigid combined flexible ureteroscope group were significantly less than those of the PCNL group (P<0.05). What’s more, the intraoperative blood loss and postoperative fever rate in the modular rigid combined flexible ureteroscope group were less than those in the PCNL group (P<0.05).

Conclusions

Modular rigid combined flexible ureteroscopy are safe and effective for 2-3 cm renal pelvic stone. It has advantages of shorter operative time, less trauma, faster recovery, and less complications.

表1 组合式输尿管硬镜联合软镜组(输尿管镜组)与经皮肾镜组患者一般资料的比较
表2 两组手术相关资料的比较
[1]
Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, et al. EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis[J]. Eur Urol, 2016 , 69(3): 475-482.
[2]
王少刚, 余虓. 经皮肾镜碎石取石术的现状与进展[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(3): 140-143.
[3]
Proietti S, Knoll T, Giusti G. Contemporary ureteroscopic management of renal stones[J]. Int J Surg,2016, 36(Pt D): 681-687.
[4]
Aboumarzouk OM, Monga M, Kata SG, et al. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for stones >2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Endourol, 2012, 26(10): 1257-1263.
[5]
那彦群, 叶章群, 孙颖浩, 等. 2014版中国泌尿外科疾病诊断治疗指南[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2014: 129-137.
[6]
Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Lingeman JE, et al. Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations[J]. J Urol, 2005, 173(6): 1991-2000.
[7]
Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, et al. EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis[J]. Eur Urol, 2016, 69(3): 475-82.
[8]
Riley JM, Stearman L, Troxel S. Retrograde ureteroscopy for renal stones larger than 2.5 cm[J]. J Endourol, 2009, 23(9): 1395-1398.
[9]
周均洪, 唐炎权, 廖芝健, 等. 一期经输尿管硬通道下软硬镜与软通道下软镜钬激光碎石治疗直径2-4 cm肾盂结石的比较[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2016, 16(2): 161-164.
[10]
Takazawa R, Kitayama S, Tsujii T. Successful outcome of flexible ureteroscopy with Holmium laser lithotripsy for renal stones 2 cm or greater[J]. Int J Urol, 2012, 19(3): 264-267.
[11]
Akman T, Binbay M, Ozgor F, et al. Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde flexible nephrolithotripsy for the management of 2-4 cm stones: a matched-pair analysis[J]. BJU Int, 2012, 109(9): 1384-1389.
[12]
冷松柏, 钟毅, 黄明. 输尿管软镜与微通道经皮肾镜治疗肾结石(≤2 cm)的比较[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2017,11(1): 38-41.
[13]
Wang Q, Guo J, Hu H, et al. Rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large proximal ureteral stones:a meta-analysis[J]. PLoS One, 2017,12(2): e0171478.
[14]
侯祺, 黄文涛, 李茂胤, 等. 微通道经皮肾镜与输尿管软镜治疗肾结石有效性和安全性的meta分析[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2015, 9(3): 189-194.
[15]
Agarwal M, Agrawal MS, Jaiswal A, et al. Safety and efficacy of ultrasonography as an adjunct to fluoroscopy for renal access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL)[J]. BJU Int, 2011, 108(8): 1346-1349.
[1] 曹彬, 王强, 卢扬柏, 黄红星, 黄亚强, 龙永富, 钟睿, 李灿永, 罗刚. 单孔经皮肾镜和腹腔镜处理肾囊肿的术式对比研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 566-571.
[2] 石兵, 张智, 陈金海, 唐文. 基于电磁跟踪和手术导航系统的实时超声引导下两种经皮肾盏穿刺方法的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 572-578.
[3] 莫淇舟, 苏劲, 黄健, 李健维, 李思宁, 柳建军. 智能控压输尿管软镜碎石吸引取石术在直径10~25 mm上尿路结石中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 497-502.
[4] 苏博兴, 肖博, 李建兴. 2024年美国泌尿外科学会年会结石领域手术治疗相关热点研究及解读[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 303-308.
[5] 张斌, 孙代宇, 胡昕, 韩菲, 李久明, 李功雨, 吴伟力, 冯宝富, 彭国辉. 评分系统预测不同经验手术者输尿管软镜术后结石清除率准确性的比较研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 353-360.
[6] 麦子结, 曾学晴, 张乾升, 刘永达. 输尿管软镜术后严重出血治疗的初步探索[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 366-371.
[7] 莫淇舟, 柳建军, 叶木石, 黄兴端, 李健维, 李思宁, 黄健, 苏劲. 二期原通道经皮肾镜联合输尿管软镜治疗经皮肾镜术后残石[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 380-385.
[8] 詹留松, 刘百川, 赵建朋, 薛国详. 可弯曲负压吸引鞘辅助输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 271-276.
[9] 李云智, 蒋晓峰, 金铭, 杨江华, 李海斌, 赵盟杰, 刘冬, 高国静, 孟繁超, 崔功静, 廖晓星. 输尿管软镜碎石术治疗累计直径>2 cm上尿路结石一期清石率影响因素及预测模型建立[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 58-63.
[10] 张飞, 许陈祥, 邵涛, 王伟, 周红庆. 二期局麻下应用膀胱软镜处理复杂性肾结石经皮肾镜术后残石的研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 69-73.
[11] 张毅, 苟成仁, 郭振宇, 郑进, 蒋旭东. 经皮肾镜术中损伤肾静脉导致造瘘管异位至腔静脉内一例报告(附专家点评)[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 90-92.
[12] 陈美仁, 戴逸骅, 张茹, 戴英波. "蛙泳"俯卧位在经皮肾镜术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 581-586.
[13] 龙卫兵, 刘晓冰, 易仁政, 邹德博, 蒋玉斌, 陈亮, 谢超群, 刘红叶, 粟周华, 张雄峰, 李麒麟. CT、B超预定位"三步法"经皮肾镜治疗上尿路结石[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 587-592.
[14] 张曦才, 曹先德. 经皮肾镜取石术治疗无积水肾结石中皮肾通道建立的应用研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 911-915.
[15] 张曦才, 曹先德, 高建萍, 沈大庆, 曹现祥, 郭诗杰, 李凤岳, 肖琳. 免人工肾积水在超声引导经皮肾镜取石术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 798-803.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?