切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (01) : 24 -27. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2018.01.007

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

组合式输尿管硬镜联合软镜与经皮肾镜治疗肾盂结石的比较
邢刚1,(), 邓国卫1, 廖国亮1, 覃怀成1   
  1. 1. 527300 广东,云浮市中医院外二科
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-30 出版日期:2018-02-01
  • 通信作者: 邢刚

Comparison of modular rigid combined flexible ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal pelvis stones

Gang Xing1,(), Guowei Deng1, Guoliang Liao1, Huaicheng Qin1   

  1. 1. Department of the Second Surgery, Yunfu Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangdong 527300, China
  • Received:2017-03-30 Published:2018-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Gang Xing
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xing Gang, Email:
引用本文:

邢刚, 邓国卫, 廖国亮, 覃怀成. 组合式输尿管硬镜联合软镜与经皮肾镜治疗肾盂结石的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(01): 24-27.

Gang Xing, Guowei Deng, Guoliang Liao, Huaicheng Qin. Comparison of modular rigid combined flexible ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal pelvis stones[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(01): 24-27.

目的

探讨组合式输尿管硬镜联合软镜在治疗2~3 cm肾盂结石中的临床应用价值。

方法

回顾性分析云浮市中医院2014年4月至2016年4月收治的87例2~3 cm肾盂结石患者的临床资料,分为组合式输尿管硬镜联合软镜组(40例)和经皮肾镜组(47例),对两组手术时间、结石清除率、平均住院时间及并发症发生率进行观察对比。

结果

纳入研究的两组患者术前一般资料比较差别无统计学意义。组合式输尿管硬镜联合软镜组和经皮肾镜组在结石清除率方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);但组合式输尿管硬镜联合软镜组在手术时间,平均住院时间明显优于经皮肾镜组(P<0.05);而且组合式输尿管硬镜联合软镜组术中出血量及术后发热率少于经皮肾镜组(P<0.05)。

结论

组合式输尿管硬镜结合软镜治疗2~3 cm肾盂结石是安全有效的,具有手术时间短、创伤小,康复快,严重并发症少等优点,值得临床上推广和应用。

Objective

To compare the clinical effects of modular rigid combined flexible ureteroscopy and percntaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for 2-3 cm renal pelvis stones.

Methods

From April 2014 to April 2016, 87 patients with renal pelvis stones (sized 2-3 cm) underwent either modular rigid combined flexible ureteroscopy (n=40) or PCNL (n=47) were accessed. The operative time, postoperative hospital stay time, stone-free rate and complications were analyzed and compared between the two groups.

Results

There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in preoperative general data. In terms of stone-free rate, there was no significant difference between modular rigid combined flexible ureteroscope group and PCNL group (P>0.05). However, the operative time and the postoperative hospital stay time in the modular rigid combined flexible ureteroscope group were significantly less than those of the PCNL group (P<0.05). What’s more, the intraoperative blood loss and postoperative fever rate in the modular rigid combined flexible ureteroscope group were less than those in the PCNL group (P<0.05).

Conclusions

Modular rigid combined flexible ureteroscopy are safe and effective for 2-3 cm renal pelvic stone. It has advantages of shorter operative time, less trauma, faster recovery, and less complications.

表1 组合式输尿管硬镜联合软镜组(输尿管镜组)与经皮肾镜组患者一般资料的比较
表2 两组手术相关资料的比较
[1]
Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, et al. EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis[J]. Eur Urol, 2016 , 69(3): 475-482.
[2]
王少刚, 余虓. 经皮肾镜碎石取石术的现状与进展[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(3): 140-143.
[3]
Proietti S, Knoll T, Giusti G. Contemporary ureteroscopic management of renal stones[J]. Int J Surg,2016, 36(Pt D): 681-687.
[4]
Aboumarzouk OM, Monga M, Kata SG, et al. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for stones >2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Endourol, 2012, 26(10): 1257-1263.
[5]
那彦群, 叶章群, 孙颖浩, 等. 2014版中国泌尿外科疾病诊断治疗指南[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2014: 129-137.
[6]
Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Lingeman JE, et al. Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations[J]. J Urol, 2005, 173(6): 1991-2000.
[7]
Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, et al. EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis[J]. Eur Urol, 2016, 69(3): 475-82.
[8]
Riley JM, Stearman L, Troxel S. Retrograde ureteroscopy for renal stones larger than 2.5 cm[J]. J Endourol, 2009, 23(9): 1395-1398.
[9]
周均洪, 唐炎权, 廖芝健, 等. 一期经输尿管硬通道下软硬镜与软通道下软镜钬激光碎石治疗直径2-4 cm肾盂结石的比较[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2016, 16(2): 161-164.
[10]
Takazawa R, Kitayama S, Tsujii T. Successful outcome of flexible ureteroscopy with Holmium laser lithotripsy for renal stones 2 cm or greater[J]. Int J Urol, 2012, 19(3): 264-267.
[11]
Akman T, Binbay M, Ozgor F, et al. Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde flexible nephrolithotripsy for the management of 2-4 cm stones: a matched-pair analysis[J]. BJU Int, 2012, 109(9): 1384-1389.
[12]
冷松柏, 钟毅, 黄明. 输尿管软镜与微通道经皮肾镜治疗肾结石(≤2 cm)的比较[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2017,11(1): 38-41.
[13]
Wang Q, Guo J, Hu H, et al. Rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large proximal ureteral stones:a meta-analysis[J]. PLoS One, 2017,12(2): e0171478.
[14]
侯祺, 黄文涛, 李茂胤, 等. 微通道经皮肾镜与输尿管软镜治疗肾结石有效性和安全性的meta分析[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2015, 9(3): 189-194.
[15]
Agarwal M, Agrawal MS, Jaiswal A, et al. Safety and efficacy of ultrasonography as an adjunct to fluoroscopy for renal access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL)[J]. BJU Int, 2011, 108(8): 1346-1349.
[1] 陈美仁, 戴逸骅, 张茹, 戴英波. "蛙泳"俯卧位在经皮肾镜术中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 581-586.
[2] 龙卫兵, 刘晓冰, 易仁政, 邹德博, 蒋玉斌, 陈亮, 谢超群, 刘红叶, 粟周华, 张雄峰, 李麒麟. CT、B超预定位"三步法"经皮肾镜治疗上尿路结石[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 587-592.
[3] 方钟进, 黄华生, 陈早庆, 郁兆存, 郑哲明, 谢永康, 陈仲宁, 邹演辉, 刘乾海, 陈镇宏. 负压组合式输尿管镜联合输尿管软镜与经皮肾镜治疗复杂性肾结石的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 601-604.
[4] 曹智, 朱希望, 王尉, 张辉, 杨成林, 张小明. 经皮肾镜碎石取石术中不同肾盂内压力与围术期并发症相关性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 616-620.
[5] 周川鹏, 杨浩, 魏微阳, 王奇, 黄亚强. 微创与标准通道经皮肾镜治疗肾结石合并肾功能不全的对比研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 470-475.
[6] 张磊, 米洋, 王昌喜, 李曜行, 王小东, 牛旭东, 王靖宇. 一次性输尿管软镜通路鞘两种置入深度的临床研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 486-489,494.
[7] 张星宇, 李炯明, 刘建和, 方克伟, 王光, 杨博伟. 无管化PCNL适应证选择及疗效观察[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 512-515.
[8] 窦上文, 邓欢, 刘邦锋, 岳高远志, 朱华财, 刘永达. 术前复查尿培养在预测微通道经皮肾镜取石术相关感染并发症中的作用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 361-366.
[9] 颜廷帅, 全科立, 舒建平, 何高飞. 经皮肾镜碎石取石术中留置双J管制造肾积水的研究进展[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 415-417.
[10] 吴骏超, 和术臣, 王海峰, 王家平, 邱学德. 输尿管软镜与经皮肾镜治疗有经皮肾镜手术史的复杂性结石的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 233-236.
[11] 王鑫, 覃智标, 陈思桦, 张家宙, 毕革文, 雷华, 李起广. 术前低剂量CT预定位及术中B超修正定位在经皮肾镜术中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 223-227.
[12] 陈丽茹, 吴小凤, 唐守艳, 吴婵, 邓含, 冯钰. 废液引流俯卧位包的设计及其在经皮肾镜术中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 219-222.
[13] 金敬苗, 韦巍, 钟羽翔, 麦源, 黄剑华, 赵朋朋, 林富祥, 李旷怡, 徐战平. 侧卧位微创经皮肾镜联合Y形负压吸引鞘治疗中老年铸型结石的研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 144-148.
[14] 张曦才, 曹先德. 经皮肾镜取石术治疗无积水肾结石中皮肾通道建立的应用研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 911-915.
[15] 张曦才, 曹先德, 高建萍, 沈大庆, 曹现祥, 郭诗杰, 李凤岳, 肖琳. 免人工肾积水在超声引导经皮肾镜取石术中的应用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 798-803.
阅读次数
全文


摘要