切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (04) : 249 -253. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2020.04.003

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

俯卧分腿位一期经皮肾镜联合输尿管软镜治疗复杂性铸型结石的临床研究
卢国平1,(), 廖科诚1, 张志甫1   
  1. 1. 530001 南宁,广西壮族自治区民族医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-02 出版日期:2020-08-01
  • 通信作者: 卢国平

The clinical study of percutaneous nephrolithotomy combined with retrograde flexible ureteroseopic lithotripsy in the prone split-leg position for treating renal staghorn calculi

Guoping Lu1,(), Kecheng Liao1, Zhifu Zhang1   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, Guangxi Minzu Hospital, Nanning 530001, China
  • Received:2019-12-02 Published:2020-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Guoping Lu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Lu Guoping, Email:
引用本文:

卢国平, 廖科诚, 张志甫. 俯卧分腿位一期经皮肾镜联合输尿管软镜治疗复杂性铸型结石的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(04): 249-253.

Guoping Lu, Kecheng Liao, Zhifu Zhang. The clinical study of percutaneous nephrolithotomy combined with retrograde flexible ureteroseopic lithotripsy in the prone split-leg position for treating renal staghorn calculi[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(04): 249-253.

目的

探讨俯卧分腿位一期经皮肾镜(PCNL)联合逆行输尿管软镜(RIRS)治疗复杂性铸型结石的可行性、有效性和安全性。

方法

回顾性分析我院2015年8月至2019年8月93例复杂性铸型结石患者的临床资料,其中PCNL组50例仅行PCNL,PCNL+RIRS组43例一期行PCNL联合RIRS,术前肾结石情况采用S.T.O.N.E评分系统进行评估;两组均在截石位下置入输尿管支架管(剪去头端),PCNL组改为俯卧位,PCNL+RIRS组改为俯卧分腿位,比较两组的手术时间、术后血红蛋白下降值、术后发热率、再次手术率、结石清除率、术后住院天数及并发症。

结果

两组的术前基本资料差异无统计学意义,所有患者均顺利完成手术,PCNL+RIRS组需要建立的通道显著少于PCNL组;PCNL+RIRS组在血红蛋白下降值、结石清除率、再次手术率、平均住院天数上均明显优于PCNL组;虽然两组在手术时间、术后发热率、手术并发症差异无统计学意义,但是PCNL组有1例需要介入栓塞患者,并且PCNL组患者术后发热比例高于PCNL+RIRS组,差异无统计学意义可能与本研究例数较少有关。

结论

俯卧分腿位一期经皮肾镜联合逆行输尿管软镜治疗复杂性肾结石安全有效,可以减少穿刺通道和术中出血,提高结石清除率,降低再次手术率。

Objective

Investigate the feasibility, efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) combined with retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in the treatment of renal staghorn calculi in split-leg prone position.

Methods

The clinical data of 93 patients with renal staghorn calculi in our hospital from August 2015 to August 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. 50 patients in the PCNL group received PCNL surgery only, and 43 patients in the PCNL+RIRS group received PCNL combined with RIRS surgery. The preoperative renal calculus was evaluated by the S.T.O.N.E scoring system. Both groups were inserted into the ureteral stents (getting rid of the head end) in the lithotomy position, then the PCNL group was changed to prone position for PCNL surgery, and the PCNL+RIRS group was changed to split-leg prone position. Operation time, postoperative hemoglobin decline, postoperative fever rate, reoperation rate, stone clearance rate, postoperative hospital stay and complications were compared between the two groups.

Results

There was no significant difference in preoperative basic data between the two groups. The procedure was successfully performed in all the patients, and the channels which were needed to be established in the PCNL+RIRS group were significantly less than that in the PCNL group. The PCNL+RIRS group have the advantage over the PCNL group in terms of decreased hemoglobin, stone clearance rate, reoperation rate and average hospital stay. Although there was no statistical difference in the operation time, postoperative fever rate and complications between the two groups, there was 1 patient in the PCNL group who needed embolization intervention because of bleeding. In addition, the ratio of postoperative fever in the PCNL group was higher than that in the PCNL+RIRS group, but no statistical difference was found. That may be attributed to the small number of cases in this study.

Conclusions

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) combined with retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in split-leg prone position is safe and effective for the treatment of renal staghorn calculi, which can reduce the channels and intraoperative bleeding, improve stone clearance rate and reduce reoperation rate.

表1 两组复杂性铸型结石病例的基本资料的比较
图1 PCNL+RIRS组患者的俯卧分腿位
表2 两组患者手术资料比较
[1]
Diri A, Diri B. Management of staghorn renal stones[J]. Ren Fail, 2018, 40(1): 357-362.
[2]
Leng S, Xie D, Zhong Y, et al. Combined single-tract of minimally percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy for staghorn calculi in oblique supine lithotomy position[J]. Surg Innov, 2018, 25(1): 22-27.
[3]
许可慰, 张彩霞, 郭正辉, 等. 斜仰卧-截石位经皮肾镜取石术治疗复杂性肾结石[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2012, 6(5): 339-344.
[4]
Gökce Mİ, Ibiş A, Sancı A, et al. Comparison of supine and prone positions for percutaneous nephrolithotomy in treatment of staghorn stones[J]. Urolithiasis, 2017, 45(6): 603-608.
[5]
Okhunov Z, Friedlander JI, George AK, et al. S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry: novel surgical classification system for kidney calculi[J]. Urol, 2013, 81(6): 1154-1159.
[6]
Dionysios M, Walter A, Markus G, et al. Reporting and grading of complications after urologic surgical procedures: an ad hoc EAU guidelines panel assessment and recommendations[J]. Actas Urol Esp, 2013, 2013, 37(2): 1-11.
[7]
Wen J, Xu G, Du C, et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery with flexible ureteroscope for partial staghorn calculi: A randomised controlled trial[J]. Int J Surg, 2016, 28: 22-27.
[8]
程跃, 谢国海, 严泽军, 等. 逆行输尿管软镜联合可视微通道经皮肾镜一期治疗鹿角形肾结石的临床分析[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2016, 37(2): 127-130.
[9]
Kim BS. Recent advancement or less invasive treatment of percutaneous nephrolithotomy[J]. Korean J Urol, 2015, 56(9):614-23.
[10]
Marguet CG, Springhart WP, Tan YH, et al. Simultaneous combined use of flexible ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy to reduce the number of access tracts in the management of complex renal calculi[J]. BJU Int, 2005, 96(7): 1097-1100.
[11]
Yuan D, Liu Y, Rao H, et al. Supine Versus Prone Position in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Calculi: A Meta-Analysis[J]. J Endourol, 2016, 30(7): 754-763.
[12]
Quaresima L, Conti A, Vici A, et al. Safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the Galdakao - Modified Supine Valdivia position: A prospective analysis[J]. Arch Ital Urol Androl, 2016, 88(2): 93-96.
[13]
苏帅, 尹志康, 王云龙, 等. 俯卧分腿位经皮肾镜碎石取石术治疗肾结石[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂(电子版), 2018, 12(6): 364-369.
[14]
Amri M, Naouar S, Ben Khalifa B, et al. Predictive factors of bleeding and fever after percutaneous nephrolithotomy[J]. Tunis Med, 2019, 97(5): 667-674.
[15]
谢国海, 刘万樟, 方立,等. 经皮肾镜取石术术中肾盂内压与镜鞘比的关系[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2018, 39(9): 703-706.
[1] 曹彬, 王强, 卢扬柏, 黄红星, 黄亚强, 龙永富, 钟睿, 李灿永, 罗刚. 单孔经皮肾镜和腹腔镜处理肾囊肿的术式对比研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 566-571.
[2] 石兵, 张智, 陈金海, 唐文. 基于电磁跟踪和手术导航系统的实时超声引导下两种经皮肾盏穿刺方法的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 572-578.
[3] 莫淇舟, 苏劲, 黄健, 李健维, 李思宁, 柳建军. 智能控压输尿管软镜碎石吸引取石术在直径10~25 mm上尿路结石中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 497-502.
[4] 苏博兴, 肖博, 李建兴. 2024年美国泌尿外科学会年会结石领域手术治疗相关热点研究及解读[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 303-308.
[5] 张斌, 孙代宇, 胡昕, 韩菲, 李久明, 李功雨, 吴伟力, 冯宝富, 彭国辉. 评分系统预测不同经验手术者输尿管软镜术后结石清除率准确性的比较研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 353-360.
[6] 麦子结, 曾学晴, 张乾升, 刘永达. 输尿管软镜术后严重出血治疗的初步探索[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 366-371.
[7] 莫淇舟, 柳建军, 叶木石, 黄兴端, 李健维, 李思宁, 黄健, 苏劲. 二期原通道经皮肾镜联合输尿管软镜治疗经皮肾镜术后残石[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 380-385.
[8] 詹留松, 刘百川, 赵建朋, 薛国详. 可弯曲负压吸引鞘辅助输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 271-276.
[9] 李云智, 蒋晓峰, 金铭, 杨江华, 李海斌, 赵盟杰, 刘冬, 高国静, 孟繁超, 崔功静, 廖晓星. 输尿管软镜碎石术治疗累计直径>2 cm上尿路结石一期清石率影响因素及预测模型建立[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 58-63.
[10] 张飞, 许陈祥, 邵涛, 王伟, 周红庆. 二期局麻下应用膀胱软镜处理复杂性肾结石经皮肾镜术后残石的研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 69-73.
[11] 张毅, 苟成仁, 郭振宇, 郑进, 蒋旭东. 经皮肾镜术中损伤肾静脉导致造瘘管异位至腔静脉内一例报告(附专家点评)[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 90-92.
[12] 龙卫兵, 刘晓冰, 易仁政, 邹德博, 蒋玉斌, 陈亮, 谢超群, 刘红叶, 粟周华, 张雄峰, 李麒麟. CT、B超预定位"三步法"经皮肾镜治疗上尿路结石[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 587-592.
[13] 陈美仁, 戴逸骅, 张茹, 戴英波. "蛙泳"俯卧位在经皮肾镜术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 581-586.
[14] 张曦才, 曹先德. 经皮肾镜取石术治疗无积水肾结石中皮肾通道建立的应用研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 911-915.
[15] 张曦才, 曹先德, 高建萍, 沈大庆, 曹现祥, 郭诗杰, 李凤岳, 肖琳. 免人工肾积水在超声引导经皮肾镜取石术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 798-803.
阅读次数
全文


摘要