Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (05): 423-427. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2021.05.014

• Clinical Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clinical efficacy of presetting double J tube and using ureteral access sheath in ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of renal pelvis calculi

Fan Yang1,(), Xuwei Lu1, Zhuifeng Guo1, Yang He1, Bingde Yin1, Liang Qin1, Hang Wang2, Jiawen Wu1   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, Minhang Branch, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University School of Medicine, Shanghai 201100, China
    2. Department of Urology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200032, China
  • Received:2020-07-06 Online:2021-10-01 Published:2022-04-27
  • Contact: Fan Yang

Abstract:

Objective

To investigate the safety and efficacy of presetting double J tube and using ureteroscopic lithotripsy combined with ureteral sheath in the treatment of renal pelvis calculi.

Methods

The clinical data of 78 cases of 2-3 cm renal pelvis calculi with mild hydronephrosis from January 2017 to January 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. In group A, 18 patients were treated with presetting double J tube in phase I, ureteroscopic lithotripsy combined with ureteroscopic lithotripsy in phase II. In group B, 22 patients were treated with ureteroscopic lithotripsy.In group C, 38 patients were treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy. The operation time, stone clearance rate, hospitalization days, hospitalization cost, postoperative fever rate and bleeding rate were compared and analyzed.

Results

All the operations were successfully completed. The operation time of group A was (95±14) min, group B (106±11) min, group C (88±15) min, there were significant differences between group B compared with group A and group C (P<0.05). The stone removal rate of stage I pyelolithiasis in group A was 77.78%, group B was 72.73%, and group C was 84.21%, the differences were not statistically significant (P>0.05). There were 2 cases of low fever and 0 case of high fever in group A, 5 cases of low fever and 3 cases of high fever in group B, 8 cases of low fever, 3 cases of moderate high fever in group C, the rate of postoperative fever in group A was lower than that in group B and group C, but the differences were not statistically significant (P>0.05). The hospitalization days in group A were (2.61±0.61) d, in group B were (3.27±0.98) d, in group C were (4.58±1.08) d, and the hospitalization days in group A were significantly lower than that in group B and group C, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). In group C, there were 2 cases of bleeding, which were cured by conservative treatment.

Conclusion

For the patients with 2-3 cm renal pelvis calculi and mild hydronephrosis, presetting double J tube and using ureteroscopic lithotripsy combined with ureteral sheath is reliable, with the advantages of less trauma, fewer days in hospital and low incidence of complications.

Key words: Preset double J tube, Ureteral access sheath, Ureteroscopy, Holmium laser, Renal pelvis calculi

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-85252990 E-mail: chinendourology@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd