切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (06) : 375 -379. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2018.06.004

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

输尿管软镜与微通道经皮肾镜治疗2~3 cm肾结石的对照研究
刘杰1, 白大应1,(), 石磊2, 严映敏1, 李柱仕1, 张忠军1   
  1. 1. 641300 四川,资阳市人民医院泌尿外科
    2. 641301 四川,资阳市第一人民医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-19 出版日期:2018-12-01
  • 通信作者: 白大应
  • 基金资助:
    资阳市科技计划项目(Zykjjsc20-2018-17)

Comparison of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy and microchannel percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of kidneys stones with a diameter of 2 to 3 cm

Jie Liu1, Daying Bai1,(), Lei Shi2, Yingmin Yan1, Zhushi Li1, Zhongjun Zhang1   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, Ziyang City People's Hospital, Sichuan 641300, China
    2. Department of Urology, Ziyang City the First People's Hospital, Sichuan 641301, China
  • Received:2017-12-19 Published:2018-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Daying Bai
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Bai Daying, Email:
引用本文:

刘杰, 白大应, 石磊, 严映敏, 李柱仕, 张忠军. 输尿管软镜与微通道经皮肾镜治疗2~3 cm肾结石的对照研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(06): 375-379.

Jie Liu, Daying Bai, Lei Shi, Yingmin Yan, Zhushi Li, Zhongjun Zhang. Comparison of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy and microchannel percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of kidneys stones with a diameter of 2 to 3 cm[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(06): 375-379.

目的

通过比较输尿管软镜下钬激光碎石取石术(F-URL)及微通道经皮肾镜钬激光碎石取石术(MPCNL)治疗肾结石(2~3 cm)的临床疗效,探讨F-URL在中等体积肾结石治疗中的临床价值。

方法

选择2015年1月至2017年10月资阳市人民医院及资阳市第一人民医院泌尿外科收治的肾结石(2~3 cm)患者74例,其中行F-URL 36例(观察组),行MPCNL 38例(对照组);对比两组患者的手术时间、术前术后血红蛋白下降量、住院时间、结石清除率,以及患者术中术后并发症的情况等。

结果

对于2~3 cm的肾结石,F-URL组的手术时间明显比MPCNL组的短[(48.6±7.4)min vs (62.3±8.9] min,P<0.05],血红蛋白下降量也比MPCNL组的少[(3.2±1.7) g/L vs (17.6±4.5) g/L,P<0.05];住院时间短于MPCNL组[(4.1±1.8) d vs (6.8±2.3)d,P<0.05]。两组在结石清除率上差异无统计学意义。F-URL组的需要输血率明显低于MPCNL组(0.0% vs 7.9%,P<0.05),两组患者在尿道感染、石街形成、需要二期手术或体外碎石术等并发症方面差异无统计学意义上(P值均>0.05)。

结论

在处理2~3 cm大小的肾结石上,FURL拥有与MPCNL相当的清石率,同时在减少术后出血、缩短患者术后住院时间、降低手术对机体的创伤等方面具有较好的优势,将有更大临床应用前景。

Objective

To compare clinical efficacy and safety between flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (F-URL) and microchannel percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) for treatment of kidneys stones (2-3 cm).

Methods

From January 2015 and October 2017, 74 patients with kidneys stones (2-3 cm) in our hospitals were collected and divided into two groups, including 36 cases who underwent F-URL (observation group), and 38 cases underwent MPCNL (control group). The average operation time, the level of hemoglobin preoperative and postoperative, the average hospital stay, the stone-free rate, and the intraoperative complications were compared.

Results

Operation time in F-URL group was obviously shorter than that in MPCNL group [(48.6±7.4) min vs (62.3±8.9) min, P<0.05], and the hemoglobin decrease level was also less than that in MPCNL group [(3.2±1.7) g/L vs (17.6±4.5) g/L, P<0.05]. Moreover, the hospital stay was shorter than that in MPCNL group [(4.1±1.8) d vs (6.8±2.3) d, P<0.05]. No statistical differences were found in stone clearance rate in both groups. The rate forblood transfusion in F-URL group was lower than that in MPCNL group (0.0% vs 7.9%, P<0.05). There were no differences in urinary tract infection, the stone street formation, phase II surgery or ESWL, and the complications in two groups (all P values >0.05).

Conclusion

For the treatment of 2-3 cm kidney stones, F-URL got the same stone clearance rate as the PCNL. Compared with PCNL, F-URL had lower postoperative bleeding, shorten hospitalization time, less surgical trauma, which was worth popularizing in clinic practice.

表1 两组患者的基本资料比较
表2 两组患者围手术期情况的比较(±s
表3 两组患者术后并发症发生率比较[例(%)]
[1]
张威,彭泳涵,吴腾云,等.输尿管软镜碎石术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾下盏结石患者的meta分析[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2015,30(2): 141-145.
[2]
Turk C,Petrik A,Sarica K, et al.EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis[J].Eur Urol, 2016, 69(3): 475-482.
[3]
Miernik A,Schoenthaler M,Wilhelm K, et al. Combined semirigid and flexible ureterorenoscopy via a large ureteral access sheath for kidney stones >2 cm: a bicentric prospective assessment[J]. World J Urol, 2014, 32(3): 697-702.
[4]
Maghsoudi R,Etemadian M,Shadpour P, et al. Number of tracts or stone size: which influences outcome[J]. Urol Int, 2012, 89(1): 103-106.
[5]
程跃,刘冠琳. 输尿管软镜治疗上尿路结石的现状与进展[J]. 现代泌尿外科杂志,2014,19(5): 285-288.
[6]
黄丽娟,李炯明,刘乔保,等. 输尿管软镜治疗不同大小肾下盏结石的比较[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2015,9(1): 34-37.
[7]
Bozkurt OF,Resorlu B,Yildiz Y, et al. Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of lower-pole renal stones with a diameter of 15 to 20 mm[J]. J Endourol, 2011, 25(7): 1131-1135.
[8]
陈亮,李建兴. 经皮肾镜碎石取石术的并发症的防治[J]. 现代泌尿外科杂志,2013,18(6): 527- 531.
[9]
樊胜海,周立权,黎承杨,等. 经皮肾镜取石术中术后出血的风险因素分析[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志,2015,30(12): 1100-1104.
[10]
Assimos DG. Re: management of calyceal diverticular calculi: a comparison of percutaneous nephro1ithotomy and flexible ureterorenoscopy[J]. J Urol, 2015, 193(4): 1275-1276.
[11]
方建明,王可兵,夏宏辉,等. 输尿管软镜联合钬激光碎石术治疗肾和输尿管上段结石:附86例报告[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2012,6(1): 42-45.
[12]
张艳平,刘凯隆,路保赛,等. 软性输尿管镜和经皮肾镜治疗肾结石的疗效及安全性对比分析[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志,2014,35(11): 845-848.
[13]
冷松柏,钟毅,黄明,等. 输尿管软镜与微通道经皮肾镜治疗肾结石(≤2 cm)的比较[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2017,ll(1): 38-41.
[14]
曾国华,李佳眭,赵志健,等. 逆行软性输尿管镜下钬激光碎石术治疗肾结石的有效性与安全性分析[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志,2015,36(6): 401-404.
[15]
Knoll T,Jessen JP,Honeck P, et al. Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus miniaturized PNL for solitary renal calculi of 10-30 mm size[J]. World J Urol, 2011, 29(6): 755-759.
[16]
zeng G,zhu w,Li J, et al. The comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery for stones larger than 2 cm in patients with a solitary kidney: a matched-pair analysis[J]. Word J Urol, 2015, 33(8): 1159-1164.
[17]
侯祺,黄文涛,李茂胤,等. 微通道肾镜与输尿管软镜治疗肾结石有效性和安全性的meta分析[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2015,9(3): 29-32.
[18]
阮东丽,张更,李智斌,等. 经尿道输尿管软镜与经皮肾镜治疗单侧肾结石的比较[J/CD]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2015,9(3): 181-184.
[1] 曹彬, 王强, 卢扬柏, 黄红星, 黄亚强, 龙永富, 钟睿, 李灿永, 罗刚. 单孔经皮肾镜和腹腔镜处理肾囊肿的术式对比研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 566-571.
[2] 石兵, 张智, 陈金海, 唐文. 基于电磁跟踪和手术导航系统的实时超声引导下两种经皮肾盏穿刺方法的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 572-578.
[3] 王铭池, 梁乐琦, 刘永达. 基于NHANES数据库分析血脂与肾结石之间的关系[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 485-490.
[4] 莫淇舟, 苏劲, 黄健, 李健维, 李思宁, 柳建军. 智能控压输尿管软镜碎石吸引取石术在直径10~25 mm上尿路结石中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 497-502.
[5] 方道成, 唐春华, 胡媛媛. 肠道菌群对草酸钙肾结石形成的影响[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 509-513.
[6] 苏博兴, 肖博, 李建兴. 2024年美国泌尿外科学会年会结石领域手术治疗相关热点研究及解读[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 303-308.
[7] 张斌, 孙代宇, 胡昕, 韩菲, 李久明, 李功雨, 吴伟力, 冯宝富, 彭国辉. 评分系统预测不同经验手术者输尿管软镜术后结石清除率准确性的比较研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 353-360.
[8] 麦子结, 曾学晴, 张乾升, 刘永达. 输尿管软镜术后严重出血治疗的初步探索[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 366-371.
[9] 莫淇舟, 柳建军, 叶木石, 黄兴端, 李健维, 李思宁, 黄健, 苏劲. 二期原通道经皮肾镜联合输尿管软镜治疗经皮肾镜术后残石[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 380-385.
[10] 唐瑞政, 李舒珏, 吴文起. 果蝇模型在肾结石研究中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 214-218.
[11] 詹留松, 刘百川, 赵建朋, 薛国详. 可弯曲负压吸引鞘辅助输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 271-276.
[12] 李云智, 蒋晓峰, 金铭, 杨江华, 李海斌, 赵盟杰, 刘冬, 高国静, 孟繁超, 崔功静, 廖晓星. 输尿管软镜碎石术治疗累计直径>2 cm上尿路结石一期清石率影响因素及预测模型建立[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 58-63.
[13] 张飞, 许陈祥, 邵涛, 王伟, 周红庆. 二期局麻下应用膀胱软镜处理复杂性肾结石经皮肾镜术后残石的研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 69-73.
[14] 张毅, 苟成仁, 郭振宇, 郑进, 蒋旭东. 经皮肾镜术中损伤肾静脉导致造瘘管异位至腔静脉内一例报告(附专家点评)[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 90-92.
[15] 张曦才, 曹先德. 经皮肾镜取石术治疗无积水肾结石中皮肾通道建立的应用研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 911-915.
阅读次数
全文


摘要