切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (04) : 465 -469. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2025.04.012

临床研究

肾盂肾上盏漏斗夹角对输尿管镜钬激光碎石治疗成熟壶腹型肾盂输尿管上段结石的影响
荆强1, 刘凡1, 韩鹏飞2, 张旭辉1,()   
  1. 1030001 太原,山西医科大学第一医院泌尿外科
    2030001 太原,山西医科大学
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-02 出版日期:2025-08-01
  • 通信作者: 张旭辉
  • 基金资助:
    山西省卫健委课题(2023050)

Effect of upper infundibulopelvic angle on ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy for mature ampullary renal pelvis and upper ureter calculi

Qiang Jing1, Fan Liu1, Pengfei Han2, Xuhui Zhang1,()   

  1. 1Department of Urology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China
    2Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China
  • Received:2023-08-02 Published:2025-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Xuhui Zhang
引用本文:

荆强, 刘凡, 韩鹏飞, 张旭辉. 肾盂肾上盏漏斗夹角对输尿管镜钬激光碎石治疗成熟壶腹型肾盂输尿管上段结石的影响[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 465-469.

Qiang Jing, Fan Liu, Pengfei Han, Xuhui Zhang. Effect of upper infundibulopelvic angle on ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy for mature ampullary renal pelvis and upper ureter calculi[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(04): 465-469.

目的

探讨肾盂肾上盏漏斗夹角(UIPA)对输尿管镜下激光碎石术治疗成熟壶腹型肾盂患者输尿管上段结石的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2019年1月至2021年1月在山西医科大学第一医院治疗的58例采用输尿管硬镜治疗输尿管上段结石患者的临床资料。男17例,女41例,年龄34~71岁,平均(42±11)岁。纳入的患者均为单侧输尿管上段结石,结石直径0.8 cm~2.1 cm,平均(1.3±0.8)cm。术前均行非增强CT和静脉肾盂造影检查,确认肾盂类型,测量UIPA大小,其中UIPA<20°者39例,21°~30°者15例,>30°者4例。

结果

纳入58例患者均为成熟型肾盂,5例患者硬镜无法碎石遂中转为输尿管软镜治疗,该5例患者均为男性,其中4例UIPA>30°,1例UIPA为21°~30°,硬性输尿管镜一次性碎石成功率为91.4%(53/58)。53例患者手术时间为(48±21)min,术后住院(1.4±1.0)d。术后1~3月拔除双J管,随访1~3个月,随访期间,行泌尿系平片确认结石清除情况,清石率为88.7%(47/53)。

结论

UIPA能初步判断输尿管硬镜能否进入上盏并完成碎石,结合术前影像学分析可以分层选择治疗输尿管上段结石,减少输尿管软镜的使用,降低患者的经济负担。

Objective

To investigate the effect of the upper infundibulopelvic angle (UIPA) on the treatment of mature ampullary upper ureter calculi by ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy.

Methods

The clinical data of 58 patients with upper ureteral calculi treated with hard ureteroscope in First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from January 2019 to January 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 17 males and 41 females, aged 34-71 years, with an average age of (42±11) years. All the included patients had unilateral upper ureteral calculi with a diameter of 0.8 cm-2.1 cm, an average of (1.3±0.8) cm. Preoperative non-enhanced CT and intravenous pyelography were performed to confirm the type of renal pelvis and the UIPA. Among them, 39 cases had UIPA <20°, 15 cases had UIPA between 21° and 30°, and 4 cases had UIPA >30°.

Results

All the 58 patients were mature renal pelvis, and 5 patients was converted to flexible ureteroscopy. All five patients were males. Four had a UIPA of over 30°, and one had a UIPA between 21° and 30°. The success rate of one-time stone fragmentation using rigid ureteroscopy was 91.4% (53/58). The operation time of the 53 patients was (48±21) min. The postoperative hospitalization was (1.4±1.0) days. Double J tubes were removed 1-3 months after the operation, followed up for 1-3 months. During the follow-up, plain films of the urinary system were performed to confirm the stone clearance, and the stone clearance rate was 88.7%(47/53).

Conclusion

UIPA can preliminarily determine whether a rigid ureteroscope can enter the upper calyx and complete the lithotripsy. Combined with preoperative imaging analysis, UIPA can be used for upper ureteral stones to reduce the use of flexible ureteroscopes and the economic burden of patients.

图1 肾盂肾上盏漏斗夹角(UIPA)测量方法注:a为肾盂肾展示意图,IPA为肾盂肾下盏漏斗夹角,是肾盂中轴与下盏中轴交界处的内夹角;UIPA为肾盂中轴与上盏中轴交界处的内夹角,b为静脉肾盂造影图片
图2 较大的肾盂肾上盏漏斗夹角(UIPA)注:a为硬镜碎石失败的较大的UIPA角度,b为角度测量软件测量UIPA为53.88°
[1]
Wang W, Fan J, Huang G, et al. Prevalence of kidney stones in mainland China: a systematic review[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7: 41630. DOI: 10.1038/srep41630.
[2]
赵纪宇, 杨盛, 张军, 等. 输尿管镜联合阻石网篮与输尿管软镜治疗直径大于1.5 cm输尿管上段结石的疗效、安全及经济性对比分析[J/OL]. 泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 11(3): 22-26. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7410.2019.03.007.
[3]
Saussine C, Andonian S, Pacík D, et al. Worldwide use of antiretropulsive techniques: observations from the clinical research office of the endourological society ureteroscopy global study[J]. J Endourol, 2018, 32(4): 297-303. DOI: 10.1089/end.2017.0629.
[4]
Ozgür Tan M, Karaoğlan U, Sen I, et al. The impact of radiological anatomy in clearance of lower calyceal stones after shock wave lithotripsy in paediatric patients[J]. Eur Urol, 2003, 43(2): 188-193. DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(02)00492-x.
[5]
Balawender K, Orkisz S. The impact of pelvicalyceal anatomy on the stone formation in patients with lower pole renal stones[J]. Folia Morphol, 2018, 77(1): 16-21. DOI: 10.5603/fm.a2017.0058.
[6]
Poulakis V, Witzsch U, Remplick J, et al. Prediction of Calculus clearance after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of calculi in the inferior kidney calices. Application of the artificial neural network[J]. Urologe A, 2002, 41(6): 583-595. DOI: 10.1007/s00120-002-0194-2.
[7]
Lin CC, Hsu YS, Chen KK. Predictive factors of lower calyceal stone clearance after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL): the impact of radiological anatomy[J]. J Chin Med Assoc, 2008, 71(10): 496-501. DOI: 10.1016/S1726-4901(08)70157-6.
[8]
孙永明, 蔡伟奇, 方先林. 解剖结构对输尿管软镜钬激光碎石治疗肾下盏结石疗效的影响[J]. 现代泌尿外科杂志, 2019, 24(7): 563-566.
[9]
Golder H, Casanova D, Papalois V. Evaluation of the usefulness of the Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications[J]. Cir Esp (Engl Ed), 2023, 101(9):637-642. DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2023.02.002.
[10]
Richard F, Marguin J, Frontczak A, et al. Evaluation and comparison of scoring systems for predicting stone-free status after flexible ureteroscopy for renal and ureteral stones[J]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(8): e0237068. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237068.
[11]
Coskun A, Eryildirim B, Sarica K, et al. Comparison of mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for the minimal invasive management of lower caliceal stones[J]. Urol J, 2021, 18(5): 485-490. DOI: 10.22037/uj.v18i07.6443.
[12]
Göger YE, Özkent MS, Kılınç MT, et al. Efficiency of retrograde intrarenal surgery in lower pole stones: disposable flexible ureterorenoscope or reusable flexible ureterorenoscope?[J]. World J Urol, 2021, 39(9): 3643-3650. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03656-y.
[13]
Li Y, Chen J, Zhu Z, et al. Comparison of single-use and reusable flexible ureteroscope for renal stone management: a pooled analysis of 772 patients[J]. Transl Androl Urol, 2021, 10(1): 483-493. DOI: 10.21037/tau-20-1009.
[14]
Fathelbab TK, Abdelhamid AM, Anwar AZM, et al. Prevention of stone retropulsion during ureteroscopy: limitations in resources invites revival of old techniques[J]. Arab J Urol, 2020, 18(4): 252-256. DOI: 10.1080/2090598X.2020.1805966.
[15]
华志雄, 王建峰, 毕建斌. 输尿管软镜碎石术和输尿管硬镜联合NTrap阻石网篮碎石术治疗输尿管上段结石疗效分析[J]. 国际外科学杂志, 2020, 47(9): 599-604. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115396-20190421-00056.
[16]
朱轶勇, 孙丰, 张琦, 等. 应用管路封堵器处理输尿管上段结石的随机对照研究[J]. 现代生物医学进展, 2017, 17(1): 166-169. DOI: 10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2017.01.043.
[17]
Yi X, Li X, Peng K, et al. Stone occlusion device with drainage function is effective in ureteral calculi treatment: a preliminary report[J]. Urol Int, 2023, 107(6): 578-582. DOI: 10.1159/000530029.
[18]
盛畅, 江泉, 王大伟. PercSys型输尿管管路封堵器在输尿管镜钬激光碎石治疗输尿管结石中的应用[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2013, 13(10): 896-898. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2013.10.011.
[19]
马继慈, 徐鹏程, 刘成益, 等. 封堵器联合输尿管硬镜与输尿管软镜在治疗输尿管超上段结石中的疗效对比[J]. 国际泌尿系统杂志, 2023, 43(1): 72-75. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn431460-20210513-00017.
[20]
丁小波, 徐鹏程, 陈德刚, 等. 封堵器联合输尿管镜与微通道经皮肾镜在治疗输尿管上段结石中的疗效对比[J]. 国际泌尿系统杂志, 2020, 40(2): 207-210. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4416.2020.02.005.
[21]
Siener R. Nutrition and kidney stone disease[J]. Nutrients, 2021, 13(6): 1917. DOI: 10.3390/nu13061917.
[22]
Rule AD, Lieske JC, Pais VM Jr. Management of kidney stones in 2020[J]. Jama, 2020, 323(19): 1961. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.0662.
[23]
韩帅红, 张旭辉, 张彬, 等. 改良输尿管硬镜钬激光碎石术治疗输尿管上段结石疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(5): 336-339.
[24]
金奎龙, 崔尚允, 池亨根. 肾盂肾盏的形态观察[J]. 延边医学院学报, 1982, 5(2): 27-32.
[25]
Bhojani N, Paranjpe R, Cutone B, et al. Infectious complications, healthcare resource use, and medical costs associated with delays in percutaneous nephrolithotomy among patients with stone disease and ureteral stent placement[J]. J Endourol, 2023, 37(6): 654-659. DOI: 10.1089/end.2022.0489.
[1] 谭小东, 代强, 张瑾, 黄鹏, 张鑫, 陈珊珊, 朱红学, 汪自力. 急诊行体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石临床疗效的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 359-364.
[2] 王源钊, 翁铭芳, 孙星慧. 输尿管上段结石体外冲击波碎石术后输尿管上段破裂一例报告[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 240-242.
[3] 吴春风, 卢国汉, 姚汝贺, 李健辉, 陈文杰, 黄宇. 21 F膀胱镜鞘联合8.0/9.8 F输尿管镜与等离子电切镜在膀胱结石钬激光碎石术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 579-584.
[4] 杜贵伟, 陆勇, 成博, 贺薏, 梁爽. 钬激光碎石术术后联合坦索罗辛治疗对输尿管结石患者的影响分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 491-496.
[5] 许娟, 郭逸飞, 张玥, 睢晓静, 张兵. 输尿管镜引导下经尿道组织钳取出膀胱大体积异物一例报告[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 294-295.
[6] 王思成, 贾斌, 樊体武. 输尿管硬镜腔内操作"运镜八法"运用技巧及总结[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 168-171.
[7] 方钟进, 黄华生, 陈早庆, 郁兆存, 郑哲明, 谢永康, 陈仲宁, 邹演辉, 刘乾海, 陈镇宏. 负压组合式输尿管镜联合输尿管软镜与经皮肾镜治疗复杂性肾结石的比较[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 601-604.
[8] 徐慧新, 刘波, 唐立钧. 体外冲击波治疗>1 cm输尿管上段结石失败的预测模型建立[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 506-511.
[9] 伍学成, 李远伟, 袁武雄, 王建松, 石泳中, 卢强, 李卓, 陈佳, 刘哲, 滕伊漓, 高智勇. 炎症介质谱联合降钙素原在尿源性脓毒血症中的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 476-480.
[10] 胡金科, 钟文. 妊娠期输尿管结石的处理与转归[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 377-381.
[11] 吴骏超, 和术臣, 王海峰, 王家平, 邱学德. 输尿管软镜与经皮肾镜治疗有经皮肾镜手术史的复杂性结石的比较[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 233-236.
[12] 汪帮琦, 张小明, 肖远松, 聂海波, 吕军, 王尉. 电切镜与输尿管镜在输尿管中下段结石并输尿管开口进镜困难中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 157-159.
[13] 李晓山, 刘巍, 魏世平. 双J管-Folys导尿管捆绑复合体在输尿管镜钬激光碎石术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 154-156.
[14] 黄日欢, 曹浪泉, 刘思云. 经皮肾镜联合负压吸引鞘在治疗肾和输尿管上段结石中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 54-57.
[15] 倪颖, 张铁龙, 王岗, 高玉龙, 陈韶鹏, 倪家璇. 未预置支架逆行输尿管镜治疗近端输尿管结石手术中的困难与应对[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 795-801.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?